What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
I need some expertise please
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jring" data-source="post: 3591536" data-attributes="member: 133897"><p>Hi,</p><p></p><p>the point is - will you be able to notice or even be annoyed by the green tint of the SF if you don't have another pair of bins to compare (yes, the tint is there but you need very good eyes and/or a well thought out measurement technique to see it - remember Tobias Mennle, who did that review linked above is a nature filmmaker by trade and thus might be a bit more sensitive to correct color than most...)?</p><p>If not, it might still be an option. Also a high transmission in green is certainly beneficial for low light use as rods are most sensitive around 500nm or green-blue.</p><p></p><p>Also I would really recommend to have a look at the EDG if you didn't already... preferably being able to compare with others.</p><p>Mechanics and optics are probably a notch above the other alphas, design and bragging rights less so...</p><p>Some people say the Nikons have a bad transmission... unless they look through one... it's not just only about brightness but about contrast!</p><p></p><p>I was watching a peregrine falcon nest on a power plant chimney with a group and since the fledglings were visible only occasionally and the adults quite busy too, some interesting discussions and comparisons of all optics on site took place in between... </p><p>One gentlemen with an Ultravid HD 10x50 (not sure if plus) remarked about those old Nikon porros (my early model 005 serial # SE 10x42) which I was glad to hand to him to have a look through. His commentary was "Wow this is bright!" and "Where can I buy those?" </p><p>Which is probably not true from transmission point of view but the contrast was far better in the SE on that bright day - the image of the Ultravid HD was probably brighter but looked washed out - even when veiling glare was not yet seen. When it was seen, it was in the Ultravid while the SE was unconcerned for as close as I dared to get to the sun...</p><p></p><p>Joachim</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jring, post: 3591536, member: 133897"] Hi, the point is - will you be able to notice or even be annoyed by the green tint of the SF if you don't have another pair of bins to compare (yes, the tint is there but you need very good eyes and/or a well thought out measurement technique to see it - remember Tobias Mennle, who did that review linked above is a nature filmmaker by trade and thus might be a bit more sensitive to correct color than most...)? If not, it might still be an option. Also a high transmission in green is certainly beneficial for low light use as rods are most sensitive around 500nm or green-blue. Also I would really recommend to have a look at the EDG if you didn't already... preferably being able to compare with others. Mechanics and optics are probably a notch above the other alphas, design and bragging rights less so... Some people say the Nikons have a bad transmission... unless they look through one... it's not just only about brightness but about contrast! I was watching a peregrine falcon nest on a power plant chimney with a group and since the fledglings were visible only occasionally and the adults quite busy too, some interesting discussions and comparisons of all optics on site took place in between... One gentlemen with an Ultravid HD 10x50 (not sure if plus) remarked about those old Nikon porros (my early model 005 serial # SE 10x42) which I was glad to hand to him to have a look through. His commentary was "Wow this is bright!" and "Where can I buy those?" Which is probably not true from transmission point of view but the contrast was far better in the SE on that bright day - the image of the Ultravid HD was probably brighter but looked washed out - even when veiling glare was not yet seen. When it was seen, it was in the Ultravid while the SE was unconcerned for as close as I dared to get to the sun... Joachim [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
I need some expertise please
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top