Apologies Deb, being a bit of a computer Luddite, I’ve been unable to navigate myself to the 2015 thread with the new layout, you’re probably much better with that exercise than moi...best of luck 👍
It’s here Ken
FWIW I looked for the RW today without success, ''first time'' in 19 visits, everything else present except the aforementioned! I recall that the Common Whitethroats were ''quite showy'' up until 9th Dec. disappeared, then re-appeared again on the 15th, Hoping it's still around...although I'm...
www.birdforum.net
Not that it is of any value now - I agree, this was a very interesting record and well done for getting so many (inconclusive 😁) images! Interesting discussion - thanks for bringing it up again.
- clearly observers in the field had stronger
fuscus impressions than could be realistically gleaned from the photos which aren’t helped by the broad spectrum of upper parts colour shown in different images (which is what we have come to expect from Acros even in the field!). FWIW, it did not look like a Marsh to me (for which a Dec record would be pretty unlikely) or Blyth’s to my eye but a
fuscus or European Reed possibly from the Northern Eastern part of it’s range where clinally they approach
fuscus in colour, especially when worn, which this one is to the point of being in poor feather condition. Which might have contributed to the feeling it was ‘different’ to the typical ERW we see in the UK? AFAIK, complete moult of ERW is typically between Sept-Dec in Africa but here is overlap with some
fuscus populations -and where also moult can take place between December -March - so a
fuscus en route to it’s wintering grounds would also be very worn although I’d be very surprised this one made it to where it needed to go. Wing formula also overlap (
scirpaceus v fuscus) and I can’t see anyway how it can be judged accurately on a bird so worn as this was with broken tips on some of the primaries and abraded outer fringes to the secondaries? I’m not sure whether iris colour varies in ERW moving East but birds apparently are larger which might account for the bill length (accentuated by flattened poor condition worn feathers?). The wing length didn’t look particularly long (but too long for BRW imo) but at the end of the day, given the variation in wing lengths of different populations of
fuscus, do biometrics really help in separating it from ERW? Also with the clinal/population variation in upperparts colour in both
fuscus and ERW, in addition to how worn this individual was, how could this also be attributed to race with any accuracy? That’s the problem with putative extra-limital birds, they ‘unfairly?’ are subject to a higher standard of ’proof’ than those within their normal accepted range. At least, genetically, ERW and
fuscus are clearly distinct. 😛
Interesting discussion on that thread - thanks for bringing it up again.