What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
impressions on the Canon 10x42L IS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kkokkolis" data-source="post: 3284902" data-attributes="member: 127913"><p>Can you be more specific? When you say "top", do you mean that the 10x42 equals an alpha class Zeiss/Leica/Swarovski? Specifically regarding color aberrations and sweet spot size?</p><p></p><p>I see that it is as heavy as the 18x50 is, which I have (and a 12x36 also). I'm happy with the 18x50 (after all it is a porro, with field flattener and UD glass and all). What would one gain with the 10x42 over the 18x50 which has higher resolution? Except the bigger exit pupil, since you get an even bigger with a good 8x42?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kkokkolis, post: 3284902, member: 127913"] Can you be more specific? When you say "top", do you mean that the 10x42 equals an alpha class Zeiss/Leica/Swarovski? Specifically regarding color aberrations and sweet spot size? I see that it is as heavy as the 18x50 is, which I have (and a 12x36 also). I'm happy with the 18x50 (after all it is a porro, with field flattener and UD glass and all). What would one gain with the 10x42 over the 18x50 which has higher resolution? Except the bigger exit pupil, since you get an even bigger with a good 8x42? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Canon
impressions on the Canon 10x42L IS
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top