What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
In Love with 10x42 SV
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Uhu74" data-source="post: 3239960" data-attributes="member: 126376"><p>I am certainly not recommending against the 42, but for my purposes, the 50 is clearly the better choice.</p><p>To be honest, I haven't even considered the 42, as I was looking for a bin which will be used for astronomy/low light use mainly, but yet compact and light enough to carry it a full day as a multi-role binocular.</p><p> </p><p>The weight difference is about 200 gram between the 42 and 50, and for me personally, this is not a big deal. </p><p>When you're out a full day with a 32mm, 550 gram bin, it will also get heavy after time. But of course, a heavier bin will wear you out way faster than a light one will do.</p><p>Big advantage of the 50's larger exit pupil is the viewing comfort, this also counts during day time use.</p><p></p><p>To sum it up, it is just a matter of your purpose and personal preference.</p><p>Maybe the 42 will serve your needs better than the 50|=)|</p><p></p><p>You are the only one who can decide which one is best for you.</p><p></p><p>Gijs</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Uhu74, post: 3239960, member: 126376"] I am certainly not recommending against the 42, but for my purposes, the 50 is clearly the better choice. To be honest, I haven't even considered the 42, as I was looking for a bin which will be used for astronomy/low light use mainly, but yet compact and light enough to carry it a full day as a multi-role binocular. The weight difference is about 200 gram between the 42 and 50, and for me personally, this is not a big deal. When you're out a full day with a 32mm, 550 gram bin, it will also get heavy after time. But of course, a heavier bin will wear you out way faster than a light one will do. Big advantage of the 50's larger exit pupil is the viewing comfort, this also counts during day time use. To sum it up, it is just a matter of your purpose and personal preference. Maybe the 42 will serve your needs better than the 50|=)| You are the only one who can decide which one is best for you. Gijs [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
In Love with 10x42 SV
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top