What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Introduce species to tick or not to tick.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobinD" data-source="post: 1214355" data-attributes="member: 12827"><p>The discussion about the Osprey project at Rutland and I could add the various Red Kite projects is an interesting one. To a greater extent both of these projects are publicity stunts but is that necessarily a bad thing? Both projects have engendered a great deal of local interest and pride in the restored species. The result of this is more people caring about their local wildlife. </p><p>I am basing this on discussions with collegues, leading wildlife walks, volunteering for habitat restoration (not just conservation) and giving talks to children.</p><p></p><p>So, I agree that these projects may not have been necessary in a global sense (sadly probabally very crucial for the Kite) but I would disagree they are a waste of money.</p><p></p><p>We seem to have gone rather off topic. Like most people, I follow the BOU rules on my official list and have category A and C Kites, Ospreys and WT Eagle but I certainly note the random assortment of escapes and potential Cat C species I have seen. Ultimately, it's your list...</p><p></p><p>I see Kites every day and they always captivate me whatever category you put them in!</p><p></p><p>ATB</p><p></p><p>Robin</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobinD, post: 1214355, member: 12827"] The discussion about the Osprey project at Rutland and I could add the various Red Kite projects is an interesting one. To a greater extent both of these projects are publicity stunts but is that necessarily a bad thing? Both projects have engendered a great deal of local interest and pride in the restored species. The result of this is more people caring about their local wildlife. I am basing this on discussions with collegues, leading wildlife walks, volunteering for habitat restoration (not just conservation) and giving talks to children. So, I agree that these projects may not have been necessary in a global sense (sadly probabally very crucial for the Kite) but I would disagree they are a waste of money. We seem to have gone rather off topic. Like most people, I follow the BOU rules on my official list and have category A and C Kites, Ospreys and WT Eagle but I certainly note the random assortment of escapes and potential Cat C species I have seen. Ultimately, it's your list... I see Kites every day and they always captivate me whatever category you put them in! ATB Robin [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Introduce species to tick or not to tick.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top