What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
IPD Discussion (was 8x32FL. Super-sweet? Semi-sweet?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mac308" data-source="post: 1649433" data-attributes="member: 65208"><p>I bought a pair of 8x32 FL's a couple of months back. I compared them against my Leica 8x32 BR's in all lighting conditions for a week. </p><p></p><p>Not only did the Leica have finer resolutions, the "sweet spot" was noticeably larger. The Zeiss was frankly disappointing when compared side-by side. I also disliked the "fast focus" on the FL, as well as the harsh brightness of its image. What I did like about the Zeiss was its armoring and deeper ocular cups. That's it. </p><p></p><p>Obviously mine is a sample of one, and IME, the only way to get a meaningful comparison between two binoculars is to have several of each as there is variation from individual to individual.</p><p></p><p>However, to my eyes, the Leica had a more natural image, and noticeable larger sweet-spot and finer resolution.</p><p></p><p>I was prepared to keep the FL's and sell my leica's after all I'd heard about the FL, but it was no contest to keep the Leica's.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mac308, post: 1649433, member: 65208"] I bought a pair of 8x32 FL's a couple of months back. I compared them against my Leica 8x32 BR's in all lighting conditions for a week. Not only did the Leica have finer resolutions, the "sweet spot" was noticeably larger. The Zeiss was frankly disappointing when compared side-by side. I also disliked the "fast focus" on the FL, as well as the harsh brightness of its image. What I did like about the Zeiss was its armoring and deeper ocular cups. That's it. Obviously mine is a sample of one, and IME, the only way to get a meaningful comparison between two binoculars is to have several of each as there is variation from individual to individual. However, to my eyes, the Leica had a more natural image, and noticeable larger sweet-spot and finer resolution. I was prepared to keep the FL's and sell my leica's after all I'd heard about the FL, but it was no contest to keep the Leica's. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
IPD Discussion (was 8x32FL. Super-sweet? Semi-sweet?)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top