What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Is avian taxonomy still dependent on ongoing specimen collection?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mysticete" data-source="post: 3289282" data-attributes="member: 67784"><p>You are reading things into Bailey's post that just are not there. You also pulled a quote from a paragraph in such a way that it removes the original context from the line, which is hardly polite to put it mildly</p><p></p><p>The full quote is: </p><p>"Further, if you have moral issues about collecting specimens for scientific research, then there is also no sense debating. We can agree to disagree here, but please be honest about your motives. Don't try to say the research isn't worthwhile or that scientists are doing some great harm to populations or species or that pictures are as good as specimens, just plainly tell me you have morals problems with it. I won't agree with you, but I will respect your opinion."</p><p></p><p>He is not implying that scientists don't need any sort of ethics and can shoot everything that moves. He's referring to the the pointlessness of debating people who object to any collecting on the principle that killing is wrong. and it IS pointless to debate those people, because both parties are approaching the topic from completely alien viewpoints from one another.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mysticete, post: 3289282, member: 67784"] You are reading things into Bailey's post that just are not there. You also pulled a quote from a paragraph in such a way that it removes the original context from the line, which is hardly polite to put it mildly The full quote is: "Further, if you have moral issues about collecting specimens for scientific research, then there is also no sense debating. We can agree to disagree here, but please be honest about your motives. Don't try to say the research isn't worthwhile or that scientists are doing some great harm to populations or species or that pictures are as good as specimens, just plainly tell me you have morals problems with it. I won't agree with you, but I will respect your opinion." He is not implying that scientists don't need any sort of ethics and can shoot everything that moves. He's referring to the the pointlessness of debating people who object to any collecting on the principle that killing is wrong. and it IS pointless to debate those people, because both parties are approaching the topic from completely alien viewpoints from one another. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Is avian taxonomy still dependent on ongoing specimen collection?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top