What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Is avian taxonomy still dependent on ongoing specimen collection?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paul Chapman" data-source="post: 3289496" data-attributes="member: 69491"><p>Rather than link, I have cut and paste Paul Sweet's post from the Kingfisher thread below. I'll be reading the two articles linked and in particular the first as though I'm familiar with specimen collection and consider it inescapable in many fields of nature study, at the moment, I do not consider it is necessary in ornithology. That may be as a result of ignorance on my part.... I confess an emotional reaction. I know many that have travelled the world widely seeing birds and finding species new to science. I have not. I know a number of people who have found species new to science in different fields. It is with some personal regret that my interest has been localised and amateur. I have only visited Tring once - to look at Amur Wagtail skins - but I did a little looking around the collection. How can anyone pull out a drawer of dead Gurney's Pittas without having an emotional reaction?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>All the best</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paul Chapman, post: 3289496, member: 69491"] Rather than link, I have cut and paste Paul Sweet's post from the Kingfisher thread below. I'll be reading the two articles linked and in particular the first as though I'm familiar with specimen collection and consider it inescapable in many fields of nature study, at the moment, I do not consider it is necessary in ornithology. That may be as a result of ignorance on my part.... I confess an emotional reaction. I know many that have travelled the world widely seeing birds and finding species new to science. I have not. I know a number of people who have found species new to science in different fields. It is with some personal regret that my interest has been localised and amateur. I have only visited Tring once - to look at Amur Wagtail skins - but I did a little looking around the collection. How can anyone pull out a drawer of dead Gurney's Pittas without having an emotional reaction? All the best [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Is avian taxonomy still dependent on ongoing specimen collection?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top