What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Is avian taxonomy still dependent on ongoing specimen collection?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="George Sangster" data-source="post: 3498140" data-attributes="member: 43829"><p>This is a good question. Needless to say, I think those who collect birds should also be able to defend their practice for lay people, not just for fellow scientists. </p><p></p><p>My answer: </p><p>We are not blasting thousands of birds out of the sky. We are selectively collecting birds to help us understand their identity, their relationships, their adaptations and their biology. Specimens may reveal us important things which realistically cannot be learned from other types of data. We will not collect any birds if we know this could endanger the continued existence of the species or population. The difference with the Maltese hunters is that (i) we do not enjoy killing birds, (ii) we respect local and international laws, (iii) we collect only a small number per species and only from species that are not well-represented in museums, (iv) we do not consume the birds but place the specimens in a museum where they can be examined by future generations of scientists, and (v) we collect a lot of other data with the specimen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="George Sangster, post: 3498140, member: 43829"] This is a good question. Needless to say, I think those who collect birds should also be able to defend their practice for lay people, not just for fellow scientists. My answer: We are not blasting thousands of birds out of the sky. We are selectively collecting birds to help us understand their identity, their relationships, their adaptations and their biology. Specimens may reveal us important things which realistically cannot be learned from other types of data. We will not collect any birds if we know this could endanger the continued existence of the species or population. The difference with the Maltese hunters is that (i) we do not enjoy killing birds, (ii) we respect local and international laws, (iii) we collect only a small number per species and only from species that are not well-represented in museums, (iv) we do not consume the birds but place the specimens in a museum where they can be examined by future generations of scientists, and (v) we collect a lot of other data with the specimen. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Is avian taxonomy still dependent on ongoing specimen collection?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top