What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Is avian taxonomy still dependent on ongoing specimen collection?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kratter" data-source="post: 3506788" data-attributes="member: 50001"><p>Niels</p><p>In the US at least, collecting birds is already heavily regulated. To collect in the US you need permits from the federal US Fish and Wildlife Service and the state Commissions (completely different permits and processes). These agencies are composed of wildlife biologists who are tasked with ensuring long term survival of populations. If there are listed species (endangered/threatened, migratory bird under the US Migratory Bird Treaty Act), these may require separate permits. For most of us, especially universities, collecting is also regulated by institutional committees that set policies for animal cares (IUPACs); these committees consider ethical issues. Permission to collect also depends on the land owner. If a federal or state property (e.g., US National Forest), this is usually from the wildlife biologists of the property. These often involve applications that require justification for the collection. To possess a collection of bird specimens in the US, one needs federal (USFWS, and USDA) and state permits, as well as institutional permits (e.g., environmental health and safety). If you have imported tissues specimens in your collection, you need to have your lab permitted as a BioSafety II facility. Regulation of bird importation has become a logistic nightmare in the US, and we are now required to use expensive customs brokers. Any imported specimens listed by CITES, require institutional CITES permits. That is just the US end of the regulation. All of these permits are expensive (totaling at least $1000/year).</p><p></p><p>If you are collecting in foreign countries, then you must also follow all of that country's laws and regulations (which often mirror the US in complexity). This usually involves long stays in expensive capital cities. </p><p></p><p>These are the present realities of modern bird collecting. It involves lot of staff time, staff, and funds to just complete the permit processing, and does not include any costs of field work. It involves assessment of justifications for collecting at many levels. </p><p></p><p>As I have pointed out before, the museum collectors in the US are trained biologists with a great concern for the welfare of bird populations. Most of us have graduate degrees, and we have completed higher level courses in population biology, population genetics, conservation biology, biogeography, evolution, behavior, etc. As a result, we have had the sort of training required to best assess how collecting may affect bird populations. </p><p></p><p>Lastly, we also have to appease and provide justification to the general public (e.g., Bird Forum). </p><p></p><p>Andy</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kratter, post: 3506788, member: 50001"] Niels In the US at least, collecting birds is already heavily regulated. To collect in the US you need permits from the federal US Fish and Wildlife Service and the state Commissions (completely different permits and processes). These agencies are composed of wildlife biologists who are tasked with ensuring long term survival of populations. If there are listed species (endangered/threatened, migratory bird under the US Migratory Bird Treaty Act), these may require separate permits. For most of us, especially universities, collecting is also regulated by institutional committees that set policies for animal cares (IUPACs); these committees consider ethical issues. Permission to collect also depends on the land owner. If a federal or state property (e.g., US National Forest), this is usually from the wildlife biologists of the property. These often involve applications that require justification for the collection. To possess a collection of bird specimens in the US, one needs federal (USFWS, and USDA) and state permits, as well as institutional permits (e.g., environmental health and safety). If you have imported tissues specimens in your collection, you need to have your lab permitted as a BioSafety II facility. Regulation of bird importation has become a logistic nightmare in the US, and we are now required to use expensive customs brokers. Any imported specimens listed by CITES, require institutional CITES permits. That is just the US end of the regulation. All of these permits are expensive (totaling at least $1000/year). If you are collecting in foreign countries, then you must also follow all of that country's laws and regulations (which often mirror the US in complexity). This usually involves long stays in expensive capital cities. These are the present realities of modern bird collecting. It involves lot of staff time, staff, and funds to just complete the permit processing, and does not include any costs of field work. It involves assessment of justifications for collecting at many levels. As I have pointed out before, the museum collectors in the US are trained biologists with a great concern for the welfare of bird populations. Most of us have graduate degrees, and we have completed higher level courses in population biology, population genetics, conservation biology, biogeography, evolution, behavior, etc. As a result, we have had the sort of training required to best assess how collecting may affect bird populations. Lastly, we also have to appease and provide justification to the general public (e.g., Bird Forum). Andy [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Is avian taxonomy still dependent on ongoing specimen collection?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top