BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="l_raty" data-source="post: 3551145" data-attributes="member: 24811">Bionomina 12(1)Bionomina 12(1) (25 March 2017).<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">1–3. Mark Epstein. Specimens and zoological nomenclature. [<a href="http://mapress.com/j/bn/article/view/bionomina.12.1.1" target="_blank">abstract</a>]</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">4–38. Alain Dubois. The need for reference specimens in zoological taxonomy and nomenclature. [<a href="http://mapress.com/j/bn/article/view/bionomina.12.1.2" target="_blank">abstract</a>] [<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315620044" target="_blank">full paper here</a>]</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">39–43. Ivan Löbl. Assessing biodiversity: a pain in the neck. [<a href="http://mapress.com/j/bn/article/view/bionomina.12.1.3" target="_blank">abstract</a>] [<a href="https://www.fichier-pdf.fr/2017/03/27/assessing-biodiversity-a-pain-in-the-neck-i-lobl-2017/" target="_blank">full paper here</a>]</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">44–47. Jonas José Mendes Aguiar, Jean Carlos Santos & Maria Virginia Urso-Guimarães. On the use of photography in science and taxonomy: how images can provide a basis for their own authentication. [<a href="http://mapress.com/j/bn/article/view/bionomina.12.1.4" target="_blank">abstract</a>] [<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315615149" target="_blank">full paper here</a>]</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">48–51. Victor G. D. Orrico. Photography-based taxonomy is still really inadequate, unnecessary, and potentially harmful for biological sciences. A reply to Thorpe (2017). [<a href="http://mapress.com/j/bn/article/view/bionomina.12.1.5" target="_blank">abstract</a>]</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">52–56. Marcos André Raposo & Guy M. Kirwan. What lies beneath the controversy as to the necessity of physical types for describing new species?  [<a href="http://mapress.com/j/bn/article/view/bionomina.12.1.6" target="_blank">abstract</a>] [<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315619381" target="_blank">full paper here</a>]</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">57–62. Philippe Grandcolas. Loosing the connection between the observation and the specimen: a by-product of the digital era or a trend inherited from general biology? [<a href="http://mapress.com/j/bn/article/view/bionomina.12.1.7" target="_blank">abstract</a>] [<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315669309" target="_blank">full paper here</a>]</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">63–85. Alain Dubois. Diagnoses in zoological taxonomy and nomenclature. [<a href="http://mapress.com/j/bn/article/view/bionomina.12.1.8" target="_blank">abstract</a>] [<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315619937" target="_blank">full paper here</a>]</li> </ul></blockquote>

Verification