What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Is RSPB our premier bird conservation organization any longer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kb57" data-source="post: 3395349" data-attributes="member: 133932"><p>I do appreciate the difference between driven and rough / walk-up grouse shooting, and signed the petition. Received the following response from DEFRA:</p><p><a href="https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/125003?reveal_response=yes" target="_blank">https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/125003?reveal_response=yes</a></p><p>According to DEFRA, 'grouse shooting takes place in upland areas, which are important for delivering a range of valuable “ecosystem services”, including food and fibre, water regulation, carbon storage, biodiversity, and recreational opportunities for health and wellbeing'. So drainage and muirburn to support artificially high grouse numbers don't affect water regulation, carbon storage or biodiversity...hmmm</p><p>You'll be pleased to know that hen harriers will be fine too, because (to quote again) 'the Defra led Upland Stakeholder Forum hen harrier sub-group published the Joint action plan to increase the English hen harrier population'.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kb57, post: 3395349, member: 133932"] I do appreciate the difference between driven and rough / walk-up grouse shooting, and signed the petition. Received the following response from DEFRA: [URL="https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/125003?reveal_response=yes"]https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/125003?reveal_response=yes[/URL] According to DEFRA, 'grouse shooting takes place in upland areas, which are important for delivering a range of valuable “ecosystem services”, including food and fibre, water regulation, carbon storage, biodiversity, and recreational opportunities for health and wellbeing'. So drainage and muirburn to support artificially high grouse numbers don't affect water regulation, carbon storage or biodiversity...hmmm You'll be pleased to know that hen harriers will be fine too, because (to quote again) 'the Defra led Upland Stakeholder Forum hen harrier sub-group published the Joint action plan to increase the English hen harrier population'. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Is RSPB our premier bird conservation organization any longer
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top