What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Is RSPB our premier bird conservation organization any longer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Cantelo" data-source="post: 3406120" data-attributes="member: 2844"><p>Having just caught up with this thread, I'd like to point out that being anti-lead shot, anti-illegal persecution of raptors, anti-damage to SSSIs, concerned about the intensification of flooding and wishing to see those individuals protected by their wealth and position brought to book (and denied public subsidy) for their criminality doesn't make you 'anti-shooting'. To suggest as much is tantamount to accepting that the abuses outlined are a necessary part of shooting (they aren't). The sole reason why driven grouse shooting is an issue subject to very successful online petitions (judged by the success of such campaigns generally) is because the industry has not merely failed to address these problems or simply denied them (although it does do so), but has actively and arrogantly pursued a policy of intensification of illegal persecution. There is no other explanation for the disappearance of male Hen Harriers in 2015, the continued shooting & poisoning of Red Kites in Yorkshire (and elsewhere) and the telling absence of protected birds of prey across many grouse moors. In the light of such endemic criminality and the absence of any serious attempt within the grouse shooting community to deal with this illegality (and other abuses) then the only tenable route is an outright ban. Let's not blame the messenger here, if driven grouse shooting is banned then the blame should fall full square on the industry itself. The sense of entitlement and hubristic arrogance of the shooting/hunting industry blinds them to the reality that whilst they may have the wealth and power, they do not command broader public opinion; the wind of history is blowing against them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Cantelo, post: 3406120, member: 2844"] Having just caught up with this thread, I'd like to point out that being anti-lead shot, anti-illegal persecution of raptors, anti-damage to SSSIs, concerned about the intensification of flooding and wishing to see those individuals protected by their wealth and position brought to book (and denied public subsidy) for their criminality doesn't make you 'anti-shooting'. To suggest as much is tantamount to accepting that the abuses outlined are a necessary part of shooting (they aren't). The sole reason why driven grouse shooting is an issue subject to very successful online petitions (judged by the success of such campaigns generally) is because the industry has not merely failed to address these problems or simply denied them (although it does do so), but has actively and arrogantly pursued a policy of intensification of illegal persecution. There is no other explanation for the disappearance of male Hen Harriers in 2015, the continued shooting & poisoning of Red Kites in Yorkshire (and elsewhere) and the telling absence of protected birds of prey across many grouse moors. In the light of such endemic criminality and the absence of any serious attempt within the grouse shooting community to deal with this illegality (and other abuses) then the only tenable route is an outright ban. Let's not blame the messenger here, if driven grouse shooting is banned then the blame should fall full square on the industry itself. The sense of entitlement and hubristic arrogance of the shooting/hunting industry blinds them to the reality that whilst they may have the wealth and power, they do not command broader public opinion; the wind of history is blowing against them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Is RSPB our premier bird conservation organization any longer
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top