What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Is the 500/4 IS L USM going to make me happy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="recreationalbirding" data-source="post: 3236401" data-attributes="member: 120087"><p>John & Goodallian, </p><p>Thanks for you ideas!</p><p></p><p>And Niels - thank you for a short intro to philosophy!</p><p></p><p>Not sure I agree with conclusions though. I think the main logical flaw in your reasoning is that I didn't mention in the title, or elsewhere, that I meant over a period of several years. That is just your assumption. So given that you are right, which you have not proven btw, about the long term happiness, that would only answer one specific case of all possible periods of time that the question in the title addresses.</p><p></p><p>So, in order to answer all possible interpretations of my initial question, you would have to present 1) proof of theorem about long term happiness and 2) back your answer "no" up with decent arguments for the cases where question didn't address period of several years.</p><p></p><p>And even though this felt quite refreshing for the mind - maybe we should not go deeper into this subject, as I guess it - at least for most people - could be considered slightly off topic.</p><p></p><p>:t::-O</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="recreationalbirding, post: 3236401, member: 120087"] John & Goodallian, Thanks for you ideas! And Niels - thank you for a short intro to philosophy! Not sure I agree with conclusions though. I think the main logical flaw in your reasoning is that I didn't mention in the title, or elsewhere, that I meant over a period of several years. That is just your assumption. So given that you are right, which you have not proven btw, about the long term happiness, that would only answer one specific case of all possible periods of time that the question in the title addresses. So, in order to answer all possible interpretations of my initial question, you would have to present 1) proof of theorem about long term happiness and 2) back your answer "no" up with decent arguments for the cases where question didn't address period of several years. And even though this felt quite refreshing for the mind - maybe we should not go deeper into this subject, as I guess it - at least for most people - could be considered slightly off topic. :t::-O [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Is the 500/4 IS L USM going to make me happy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top