What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Is the 500/4 IS L USM going to make me happy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave Williams" data-source="post: 3273949" data-attributes="member: 53820"><p>A word of warning Robert... the older you get the less able to deal with weight!</p><p></p><p>I deliberated for ages as to which of the two to choose, 500 or 600 MK11. I couldn't justify both but the 500 won on it's weight and volume. The 600mm is not always a viable option to take abroad and that's where so much of my photography takes place as I'm lucky enough to take a few foreign holidays each year. I also decided that the older I got the more difficult it would become to manage the extra weight so the 500 was more of a long term investment.</p><p>However, and it's a big however, I do miss the extra 20% reach my 600mm gave me. I have contemplated buying another but it would be difficult to justify having the two again as I once did, albeit the MK1 versions... so I empathise with anyone who has the guilt of having spent so much just for a hobby.</p><p>I haven't actually held a 600mm MK11 though and although it's a similar weight to the 500mm MK1 the MK11's are constructed differently. It's not a case of better balance, it's a case of better weight distribution. The front glass element has been removed and the weight is firmly at the back end of the outfit now. That means the weight is carried by the arm tucked in to the chest not the outstretched one with no support. Makes a huge difference to hand holding. Not that it matters much, but balancing the outfit on a tripod is trickier, especially with a heavy camera body on the back. </p><p>As for me, if I was going to spend a small fortune on another lens, strangely I might consider the 200-400 with a built in TC but there again, the 600 would still be in the back of my mind especially as I only have full frame bodies nowadays.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave Williams, post: 3273949, member: 53820"] A word of warning Robert... the older you get the less able to deal with weight! I deliberated for ages as to which of the two to choose, 500 or 600 MK11. I couldn't justify both but the 500 won on it's weight and volume. The 600mm is not always a viable option to take abroad and that's where so much of my photography takes place as I'm lucky enough to take a few foreign holidays each year. I also decided that the older I got the more difficult it would become to manage the extra weight so the 500 was more of a long term investment. However, and it's a big however, I do miss the extra 20% reach my 600mm gave me. I have contemplated buying another but it would be difficult to justify having the two again as I once did, albeit the MK1 versions... so I empathise with anyone who has the guilt of having spent so much just for a hobby. I haven't actually held a 600mm MK11 though and although it's a similar weight to the 500mm MK1 the MK11's are constructed differently. It's not a case of better balance, it's a case of better weight distribution. The front glass element has been removed and the weight is firmly at the back end of the outfit now. That means the weight is carried by the arm tucked in to the chest not the outstretched one with no support. Makes a huge difference to hand holding. Not that it matters much, but balancing the outfit on a tripod is trickier, especially with a heavy camera body on the back. As for me, if I was going to spend a small fortune on another lens, strangely I might consider the 200-400 with a built in TC but there again, the 600 would still be in the back of my mind especially as I only have full frame bodies nowadays. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Is the 500/4 IS L USM going to make me happy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top