What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Is the 500/4 IS L USM going to make me happy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="johnf3f" data-source="post: 3274477" data-attributes="member: 96841"><p>I agree with the comments regarding the 600 Mk1 it is a bit of a beastie! I managed to get my 800mm at a very reasonable price, in lovely condition, and a big part of my reasoning was the weight reduction compared to the 600 Mk1 - though the reach is nice too!</p><p>A while back I had a play with the Canon 200-400 and the 600 Mk2. I was surprised that the 600 Mk2 felt lighter and seemed to handle better, for me, than the 200-400. One thing that I was not expecting was how fast the AF on the 200-400 was, on that particular day, with those 2 lenses, the 600 Mk2 was noticeably slower to focus than the 200-400. Both were very fast though - we are comparing superlatives here.</p><p>I am sure Recreationalbirding will be very happy with the 600 Mk2 until Old Father Time makes him go for a 400 DO!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="johnf3f, post: 3274477, member: 96841"] I agree with the comments regarding the 600 Mk1 it is a bit of a beastie! I managed to get my 800mm at a very reasonable price, in lovely condition, and a big part of my reasoning was the weight reduction compared to the 600 Mk1 - though the reach is nice too! A while back I had a play with the Canon 200-400 and the 600 Mk2. I was surprised that the 600 Mk2 felt lighter and seemed to handle better, for me, than the 200-400. One thing that I was not expecting was how fast the AF on the 200-400 was, on that particular day, with those 2 lenses, the 600 Mk2 was noticeably slower to focus than the 200-400. Both were very fast though - we are comparing superlatives here. I am sure Recreationalbirding will be very happy with the 600 Mk2 until Old Father Time makes him go for a 400 DO! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Is the 500/4 IS L USM going to make me happy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top