No. I saw one on A-mart for $1500.00.Zeiss can`t sit on the FL fence forever, at some point they will need a top 32mm to match the 42mm`.
Have you tried an HT yet ?
No. I saw one on A-mart for $1500.00.Zeiss can`t sit on the FL fence forever, at some point they will need a top 32mm to match the 42mm`.
Have you tried an HT yet ?
Arguments are often quite reasonable and productive. Dennis talks about binoculars; you guys talk about Dennis. An interesting look into human nature, I'd say.All Dennis is interested in doing is starting arguments. He admits it here:
http://www.birdforum.net/showpost.php?p=2349208&postcount=1
"Let the arguing begin." About Dennis's real intentions!
I say that it is now very clear that Dennis's sole purpose and goal on Bird Forum is to start arguments. What say you?
Never cared for the Katmai. Poor contrast. Seemed kind of dead to me. The CL is very good though. Underated by most. It has excellent contrast.
...
I say that it is now very clear that Dennis's sole purpose and goal on Bird Forum is to start arguments. What say you?
How sure of a thing is the Zeiss HT 8x32? Is it coming out in 6 months or a year or two?
Paleface speak with forked tongue !! 8-P
Paleface speak with Great Spirit, him tell all to Paleface, Paleface says to Chosun Juan: no little HT comes this way. Chosun Juan should listen to wise words of Paleface and if little HT comes not, within 12 moons from now, she must pay Paleface much wampum!
So there.
Lee
I found when comparing them that to my eyes from a pure optic quality stand point- the 8x30 Habicht did not hold any back seat to the SV. The on axis resolution of the Habicht is simply fantastic and it is every bit as sharp as the SV in that regard- in fact it may be sharper. The little Habicht is very bright and to my eyes it resolved more detail and had better contrast than the current Nikon EII that I compared it to. I did not have an SE when I wrote that impression, but last summer when I compared the SE to the SV they were very, very close when it came to contrast and detail resolution.
In an overall binocular package the SV is a probably a better "package" of parts than the Habicht ( or include the SE in the same way)- but from a strict optics stand point the Habicht and the SE hang right with the SV. In fact there are certainly things that may be better optically about those porro's; - for one being that, and this is hard to pin point exactly with words, but to me the Habicht just had an easier effortless view if you will. You just big them up and point them at what you are looking at and the view is sharp and crisp. It does have a couple minor faults, but over all it is a great optical instrument.
But, to me the 8x32 SV may be the Decathlon champion of binoculars. I had mentioned this before, and I thought that analogy again a couple weeks ago when our own local World record holder and Olympic Champion Decathlete (Ashton Eaton) won the recent World Championship. He did not have every event that he did be the best of everyone, or even his best- but it was still overall better than everyone else. To me the 8x32 SV is like that and maybe even more so- in that it is very strong ( exceptional really) in almost every category; and really does not have weak ones. Other than if you are one of those effected by its flat field design ( the infamous RB). It may just be the overall bino champ.
For disclosure purposes- I personally do not presently own a SV.
Great Spirit is a woman! :cat: Paleface just speak with hired help (for mowing lawns, and putting out garbage!)
Chosun :gh:
How sure of a thing is the Zeiss HT 8x32? Is it coming out in 6 months or a year or two?
No. I saw one on A-mart for $1500.00.
I do know most understand where this post is coming from.
I have mentioned this before, but anyone who likes to inflame,
and declare things the best, etc. is just a troll.
Just an attention getter, optics are secondary. It is easy to pick
out the best optics, some guys just like to play around, and draw
attention to themselves.
Don't feed the troll.|[email protected]| Think about that, when posting to this guys
posts, the next time around. That means ignore and let it go.
Jerry
Jerry
Ignoring his antics and just letting it go as you say is probably the way to the
procede when it comes to Dennis's posts. I used to think that if you used one of his previous posts to point out his multitude of complete reversals and the absurdity of his posts when viewed in their overall context it would somehow hinder him but such isn't the case. Most people are concerned about their credibility but not only does Dennis lack any credibility as a reviewer but he actually doesn't care when others point out his lack of credibility because they have to make another post on his thread to do so.
I truly believe Dennis is a bit of an egomaniac and just cares about the number of posts in one of his threads, even when many of the posts are critical (and rightly so) of his methods and lack of objectivity when comparing binoculars. I like to think I was doing the right thing in the past when pointing out certain things in one of Dennis's threads but in reality I probably was accomplishing little more than "feeding the troll".
Steve
Chosun Juan knows not of which she speaks. Great Spirit speaks through the Manitou. Manitou have no gender, all things have their Manitou. Paleface speaks to Manitou of Wetzlar who is all-knowing.
Wetzlar Manitou speaks and says: how many more times do I have to tell you, there ain't no HT 32mm????????!!!!!!!:C
Paleface looks forward to much wampum from misguided and willful CJ.
TroubaLee
Every time Dennis ... posts anything ... it will blow up.
.... a 8X42 HT .... ultimately went for $1,350 ..... on Astromart.
Stephen
.............. I looked for your post comparing the 8x32 SV and the 8x30 Habicht but couldn't find it, the only one I found was your post comparing the 8x32 EL, 8x30 SLC NEU, and 8x30 CL. If you could point me in the right direction I would like to read your comparison of the SV and Habicht again.
............
Steve