Hi PCB
I have been chasing a theme here with Bottomlands regarding his and others’ recent personal sightings of IB - in the absence of a convincing photo/video, having the opportunity to discuss eyewitness accounts of this enigmatic and elusive species with living people is a great opportunity both for those hoping IB persists and for those wanting to demonstrate that it actually does.
Unfortunately, all I was able to ascertain, in the way of specifics regarding these sightings (or anyone else’s ) were;
- They are not ‘conclusive’ evidence of IBWO being extant even by the observers themselves
- That IB searchers don’t report all their sightings but keep them secret for ‘fear of blowback’
- That the sightings are referred to as ‘possibles’, ‘maybes’, ‘what else could they be?’, ‘putatives’
- Existing videos and photographs, with the exception of Tanner’s Singer Tract photos taken in the ’30s, all required extensive and detailed superimposed narratives upon frame by frame of blurry video to ‘prove’ the ID and yet the very fleeting images remain visually unidentifiable by every other ornithologist/birdwatcher.
- An average of 1 or 2 sightings are had each year by searchers yet most/all IB are ‘in deliberate hiding’ or in impenetrable habitat not accessible to searchers.
All the recent Searchers on BF seem to be joining under fake names/pseudonyms unwilling to put an identity to their historic and incredible eyewitness accounts.
And what of the accounts themselves? Every birder here will tell you, in the absence of even half decent record shots (for whatever reason) the minimum bar for acceptance of a rare bird requires good contemporaneous field notes including sketches, that gives a full detailed description (not gaps in visual observation filled with opinion and assumptions) of exactly what was seen. Even then, depending on the level of rarity, reports may not be accepted. Of course putative eyewitness accounts of IB do not belong to the same process of report verification of national rarities (eg rare bird committees) but form part of a larger and cumulative evidence portfolio gathered over decades. Even so, copies of contemporaneous fieldnotes and sketches must be publically available? (As opposed to reports typed up subsequently I mean)
The repeated references to sightings mean very little without being accompanied by copies of the handwritten fieldnotes and sketches that searchers have of their sightings - clearly, since it has been established by them, photographing IB is beyond difficult because of the flush distance etc, they will have, like any birdwatcher with decent skills in the field, taken notes and made sketches.
Can you please post a link or in the case of your own sightings, upload your fieldnotes so we can have a better idea of what your ‘sighting’ experience actually consist of?
Many thanks