What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Jan Meijerink tests 10x42 SF
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Troubador" data-source="post: 3381543" data-attributes="member: 109211"><p>VB</p><p>The way the SF has been balanced means that to most people, when they pick it up it feels extra light: I have seen this so often, folks break into a smile and say wow its so light its amazing. But not everybody does. A few folks say it feels 'toy' like because it lacks heft and they then draw conclusions about its build quality. In fact SF is only c55 grams or c2 ozs lighter than EL, its the balance that is really different.</p><p></p><p>Perceived contrast is another subject and I think that the EL might just be ahead there.</p><p></p><p>For me the comparison of SF and EL is easy: they are so close on sharpness (see the review for confirmation) and contrast etc that you might as well argue about which brand of champagne has more bubbles in a bottle. For me the balance is tipped in favour of SF by FOV and handling.</p><p></p><p>Lee</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Troubador, post: 3381543, member: 109211"] VB The way the SF has been balanced means that to most people, when they pick it up it feels extra light: I have seen this so often, folks break into a smile and say wow its so light its amazing. But not everybody does. A few folks say it feels 'toy' like because it lacks heft and they then draw conclusions about its build quality. In fact SF is only c55 grams or c2 ozs lighter than EL, its the balance that is really different. Perceived contrast is another subject and I think that the EL might just be ahead there. For me the comparison of SF and EL is easy: they are so close on sharpness (see the review for confirmation) and contrast etc that you might as well argue about which brand of champagne has more bubbles in a bottle. For me the balance is tipped in favour of SF by FOV and handling. Lee [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Jan Meijerink tests 10x42 SF
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top