What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Keep it simple!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="paddy7" data-source="post: 3330180" data-attributes="member: 88594"><p>While i can see the argument for less players in the market, and the top end becoming a little more 'efficient' and passing on the cost reduction to the customer, squeezing out the mid layer would not just hit the myriad of companies who create similar products by mix-and-matching the output of the manufacturers in the far east. It would also hit those who have a degree of innovation about them, such as Vanguard, Maven, Kite etc. These companies have their supporters and detractors, but are bringing often excellent performance within the range of those unable - or unwilling - to pay alpha prices for a single-figure percentage increase in performance (perhaps even if these prices dropped by £100 or so).</p><p>Look at the pages of comment on the Blue Sky, and the number who have found it to be ideal. Not alpha, but certainly not omega either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="paddy7, post: 3330180, member: 88594"] While i can see the argument for less players in the market, and the top end becoming a little more 'efficient' and passing on the cost reduction to the customer, squeezing out the mid layer would not just hit the myriad of companies who create similar products by mix-and-matching the output of the manufacturers in the far east. It would also hit those who have a degree of innovation about them, such as Vanguard, Maven, Kite etc. These companies have their supporters and detractors, but are bringing often excellent performance within the range of those unable - or unwilling - to pay alpha prices for a single-figure percentage increase in performance (perhaps even if these prices dropped by £100 or so). Look at the pages of comment on the Blue Sky, and the number who have found it to be ideal. Not alpha, but certainly not omega either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Keep it simple!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top