What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Kentish Plover
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richard Klim" data-source="post: 1650193" data-attributes="member: 773"><p><strong>BNA Online</strong></p><p></p><p>A new version (Page <em>et al</em>, 18 Nov 2009) of the <em>BNA Online</em> species account for <em>Charadrius alexandrinus</em> has been posted, which acknowledges recent work:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">"The family Charadriidae, the plovers and lapwings, is well supported and is one of the core groups in the shorebird (Charadriiformes) radiation. Within this family, the genus Charadrius is also well defined. A mitochondrial DNA-based phylogeny of thirteen members of the genus (Joseph et al. 1999) found <em>C. alexandrinus</em> to be sister to <em>C. ruficapillus</em> (the Red-capped Plover of Australia), and these two species, along with <em>C. marginatus</em> (the White-fronted Plover of sub-Saharan Africa) and <em>C. javanicus</em> (the Javan Plover of Java), form a superspecies (Wiersma 1996). On the basis of its geographic distribution and morphology, <em>C. peronii</em> (the Malaysian Plover of Indonesia and the Philippines) may also be an allospecies in this superspecies complex.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Species limits within this superspecies are open to debate. For example, Wiersma (1996) said of <em>C. javanicus</em> that it "may well not merit full species status" and noted that it is "often" treated conspecific with <em>C. alexandrinus</em>. At the other extreme, Howard and Moore (1994) treated <em>C. a. occidentalis</em> as a species despite its strong morphological similarity to <em>C. a. nivosus</em> (see also Sibley and Monroe 1990). Species limits of <em>C. a. dealbatus</em> are being explored currently (Kennerley et al. 2008), and it is possible that this taxon will be accord species status once its breeding range and behavior are elucidated fully.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">It is also possible that taxa in the Old World and New World will be split from each other, a Kentish Plover vs. Snowy Plover split. Ridgley and Greenfield (2001) remarked that "American birds are perhaps better treated as a distinct species (<em>C. nivosus</em>) separate from those of the Old World; their calls appear to differ," but provided no data in support. Küpper et al. (2009), however, provided data on molecular (mtDNA, a nuclear gene, and 26 microsatellites) divergence, as well as detailing differences in courtship calls and downy plumage of chicks. The genetic analyses demonstrated that <em>C. a. alexandrinus</em> is sister to <em>C. marginatus</em>, not to <em>C. a. nivosus</em>. If true, then the resultant paraphyly likely will lead taxonomists either to lump <em>C. marginatus</em> with the <em>C. alexandrinus</em> complex or split <em>C. alexandrinus</em> into Old World and New World species."</p><p></p><p>Richard</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richard Klim, post: 1650193, member: 773"] [b]BNA Online[/b] A new version (Page [I]et al[/I], 18 Nov 2009) of the [I]BNA Online[/I] species account for [I]Charadrius alexandrinus[/I] has been posted, which acknowledges recent work: [INDENT]"The family Charadriidae, the plovers and lapwings, is well supported and is one of the core groups in the shorebird (Charadriiformes) radiation. Within this family, the genus Charadrius is also well defined. A mitochondrial DNA-based phylogeny of thirteen members of the genus (Joseph et al. 1999) found [I]C. alexandrinus[/I] to be sister to [I]C. ruficapillus[/I] (the Red-capped Plover of Australia), and these two species, along with [I]C. marginatus[/I] (the White-fronted Plover of sub-Saharan Africa) and [I]C. javanicus[/I] (the Javan Plover of Java), form a superspecies (Wiersma 1996). On the basis of its geographic distribution and morphology, [I]C. peronii[/I] (the Malaysian Plover of Indonesia and the Philippines) may also be an allospecies in this superspecies complex. Species limits within this superspecies are open to debate. For example, Wiersma (1996) said of [I]C. javanicus[/I] that it "may well not merit full species status" and noted that it is "often" treated conspecific with [I]C. alexandrinus[/I]. At the other extreme, Howard and Moore (1994) treated [I]C. a. occidentalis[/I] as a species despite its strong morphological similarity to [I]C. a. nivosus[/I] (see also Sibley and Monroe 1990). Species limits of [I]C. a. dealbatus[/I] are being explored currently (Kennerley et al. 2008), and it is possible that this taxon will be accord species status once its breeding range and behavior are elucidated fully. It is also possible that taxa in the Old World and New World will be split from each other, a Kentish Plover vs. Snowy Plover split. Ridgley and Greenfield (2001) remarked that "American birds are perhaps better treated as a distinct species ([I]C. nivosus[/I]) separate from those of the Old World; their calls appear to differ," but provided no data in support. Küpper et al. (2009), however, provided data on molecular (mtDNA, a nuclear gene, and 26 microsatellites) divergence, as well as detailing differences in courtship calls and downy plumage of chicks. The genetic analyses demonstrated that [I]C. a. alexandrinus[/I] is sister to [I]C. marginatus[/I], not to [I]C. a. nivosus[/I]. If true, then the resultant paraphyly likely will lead taxonomists either to lump [I]C. marginatus[/I] with the [I]C. alexandrinus[/I] complex or split [I]C. alexandrinus[/I] into Old World and New World species."[/INDENT] Richard [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Kentish Plover
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top