What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Konrad Siel at Swaro on "Progress in Binocular Design" in 1991
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="henry link" data-source="post: 1279362" data-attributes="member: 6806"><p>Thanks for posting the link, Kevin. </p><p></p><p>The new information there for me is the bit about contrast loss at the roof faces that both reflect and transmit in a Schmidt-Pechan. I had always assumed that the TIR occurred at the surface of the glass even when it was coated. Just one more strike against the S-P.</p><p></p><p>Interesting to note how the future brought unforeseen changes in Swarovski designs. A few years after this paper the SL Porro line was discontinued while the older Traditional Porros still hang on today. The internal construction of the SL might have looked like the wave of the future, but the actual binoculars were not so attractive. Focus was at the front of the bridge and was very slow, probably because the large waterproof moving eyepiece tubes needed a high gear ratio to be easily moved. Only the 8x56 had adjustable eyecups. The field was very narrow in the 7x42, 8x56 and 7x50. The coatings had a strong yellow tint. They never went over with birders.</p><p></p><p>The basic optical design of the early SLC models (8x30/7x30) illustrated in the paper is still retained in the current 8x30 which uses a moving objective for focusing, but the later SLCs would use internal focusing lenses. I think in 1991 only the Leica Trinovids used a focusing lens and a little later the Zeiss Night Owls. </p><p></p><p>Phase coating is certainly essential for decent image quality, but I suspect that the quality of the phase coating varies in different binoculars and that in cheap phase-coated binoculars it's not very good. I noticed that the phase coating of an inexpensive roof prism bin I tested recently did not appear to be completely effective. I tested it by sighting my LCD computer screen through the objective end while rotating a polarizing sunglass lens in front of the objective. One half of the illuminated circle got very dark as I rotated the lens which I think indicates incomplete correction. This test can also be done without the LCD screen by using two polarizing lenses, one behind the eyepiece and one in front of the objective. There's an obliging retailer nearby so the next time I visit her store I hope to try this test on a number of binoculars.</p><p></p><p>Henry</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="henry link, post: 1279362, member: 6806"] Thanks for posting the link, Kevin. The new information there for me is the bit about contrast loss at the roof faces that both reflect and transmit in a Schmidt-Pechan. I had always assumed that the TIR occurred at the surface of the glass even when it was coated. Just one more strike against the S-P. Interesting to note how the future brought unforeseen changes in Swarovski designs. A few years after this paper the SL Porro line was discontinued while the older Traditional Porros still hang on today. The internal construction of the SL might have looked like the wave of the future, but the actual binoculars were not so attractive. Focus was at the front of the bridge and was very slow, probably because the large waterproof moving eyepiece tubes needed a high gear ratio to be easily moved. Only the 8x56 had adjustable eyecups. The field was very narrow in the 7x42, 8x56 and 7x50. The coatings had a strong yellow tint. They never went over with birders. The basic optical design of the early SLC models (8x30/7x30) illustrated in the paper is still retained in the current 8x30 which uses a moving objective for focusing, but the later SLCs would use internal focusing lenses. I think in 1991 only the Leica Trinovids used a focusing lens and a little later the Zeiss Night Owls. Phase coating is certainly essential for decent image quality, but I suspect that the quality of the phase coating varies in different binoculars and that in cheap phase-coated binoculars it's not very good. I noticed that the phase coating of an inexpensive roof prism bin I tested recently did not appear to be completely effective. I tested it by sighting my LCD computer screen through the objective end while rotating a polarizing sunglass lens in front of the objective. One half of the illuminated circle got very dark as I rotated the lens which I think indicates incomplete correction. This test can also be done without the LCD screen by using two polarizing lenses, one behind the eyepiece and one in front of the objective. There's an obliging retailer nearby so the next time I visit her store I hope to try this test on a number of binoculars. Henry [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Konrad Siel at Swaro on "Progress in Binocular Design" in 1991
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top