What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Konrad Siel at Swaro on "Progress in Binocular Design" in 1991
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ronh" data-source="post: 1279774" data-attributes="member: 55514"><p>Just a whimper as I go down for a final time...</p><p></p><p>Ron,</p><p>I took 40 line pairs per mm to mean the resolution in the focal plane, suggesting a real image that then requires an eyepiece to convert to visibility. I believe this is consistent with Henry's remark that the objective is a vital part of the system, and for me to speculate very deeply without knowing its MTF is futile.</p><p></p><p>Henry,</p><p>You have actually cleared it up for me, as you see from the above. The basic MTF we see is that of the objective, and it is perturbations in that that are the aim of the paper's study of the effects of prism.</p><p></p><p>Kevin, </p><p>Thanks again for the original link, and the boatload of others, which I intend to read at least part of.</p><p></p><p>Does one realization, amid mid many more unanswered questions, count as learning? You bet! Just, sort of nonlinear is all. Thanks guys, I am proud to have met such an experienced and pretentious bunch!</p><p>Glub...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ronh, post: 1279774, member: 55514"] Just a whimper as I go down for a final time... Ron, I took 40 line pairs per mm to mean the resolution in the focal plane, suggesting a real image that then requires an eyepiece to convert to visibility. I believe this is consistent with Henry's remark that the objective is a vital part of the system, and for me to speculate very deeply without knowing its MTF is futile. Henry, You have actually cleared it up for me, as you see from the above. The basic MTF we see is that of the objective, and it is perturbations in that that are the aim of the paper's study of the effects of prism. Kevin, Thanks again for the original link, and the boatload of others, which I intend to read at least part of. Does one realization, amid mid many more unanswered questions, count as learning? You bet! Just, sort of nonlinear is all. Thanks guys, I am proud to have met such an experienced and pretentious bunch! Glub... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Konrad Siel at Swaro on "Progress in Binocular Design" in 1991
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top