What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Konrad Siel at Swaro on "Progress in Binocular Design" in 1991
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ronh" data-source="post: 1282005" data-attributes="member: 55514"><p>Ron,</p><p>What a thorough reply, just when I was afraid you might have given up on me. The use of the collimator is very interesting. And it is fascinating to think that MTFs are actually measurable. If a perfect f/4 optic goes to 560 lp/mm in the focal plane, what fine granularity a CCD array must have to sense the resolving powec, to actually map out not just the peaks and valleys, but a fair representation of a sinusoid! It's all very impressive. </p><p></p><p>Thanks especially for saying that it wasn't clear from the paper how they made the measurement. That single remark has, perhaps unjustifiably, made me feel a bit less stupid!</p><p></p><p>This has been a good learning experience. I am not an optics pro. Lord knows, I do not, like you, have a decent lens kit! To you, and the other guys too, I apologize for "hammering" on this issue, perhaps too hard for a web forum, where technical discussions are difficult and should be limited. But I love this stuff.</p><p></p><p>You have been kind, and are free to go now!</p><p>Ronh</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ronh, post: 1282005, member: 55514"] Ron, What a thorough reply, just when I was afraid you might have given up on me. The use of the collimator is very interesting. And it is fascinating to think that MTFs are actually measurable. If a perfect f/4 optic goes to 560 lp/mm in the focal plane, what fine granularity a CCD array must have to sense the resolving powec, to actually map out not just the peaks and valleys, but a fair representation of a sinusoid! It's all very impressive. Thanks especially for saying that it wasn't clear from the paper how they made the measurement. That single remark has, perhaps unjustifiably, made me feel a bit less stupid! This has been a good learning experience. I am not an optics pro. Lord knows, I do not, like you, have a decent lens kit! To you, and the other guys too, I apologize for "hammering" on this issue, perhaps too hard for a web forum, where technical discussions are difficult and should be limited. But I love this stuff. You have been kind, and are free to go now! Ronh [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Konrad Siel at Swaro on "Progress in Binocular Design" in 1991
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top