I usually use 8x binoculars for birding, but decided to also buy some 10x. I'm an amateur, btw, with relatively little experience compared with many here.
I bought a Viper 10x42 a few weeks ago, which I can still return. I really like it, but was slightly surprised by the pretty firm focus wheel. I asked Vortex about this and whether it can be loosened slightly. They said yes, but the impression I got was that it wouldn't make too much of a difference. Baffled why they've made it so firm. I have a ten-year-old Vortex Crossfire II and the wheel is fairly firm, but nowhere near as firm as the Viper.
So I thought I'd try the Kowa BD II 10x42. I've seen it mentioned quite a lot here (the 8x models too), so thought I'd give it a go. The upshot is that I've decided to stick with the Viper and I think the focus wheel is something I'll get used to. It's bothering me less and less - and it's perhaps a minor negative alongside the superb optical image. Really clear, sharp, fairly flat.
I don't get on with the Kowa, for the following reasons. The image is not as neutral, it's warmer-looking. And at long distances (about 300 yards) I struggle to get things in focus (not because of shake). Or maybe things are in focus, but the image quality is not as good as the Viper. Also, while the eye relief is almost the same as the Viper, the eye-cups on the Kowa are slightly less deep and I occasionally see black areas. The Viper is also of a higher build quality, I think - reflected in the slightly higher price.
The field of view is a little wider on the Kowa, but not much, and I enjoy using the Viper far, far more. (I'm trying them at home. I live overlooking fields, hedgerows and hills.)
But perhaps most disappointingly with the Kowa, for me, considering my expectations and the reason for trying it, is the focus wheel. It's barely any looser than the Viper. It's a nicer wheel in a way because fingers grip more easily to the metal, compared with the Viper. But why Kowa and Viper make the wheels so firm is beyond me. Many don't seem to find the Kowa BD II's wheel too firm, so personal preference plays a part, of course.
I bought a Viper 10x42 a few weeks ago, which I can still return. I really like it, but was slightly surprised by the pretty firm focus wheel. I asked Vortex about this and whether it can be loosened slightly. They said yes, but the impression I got was that it wouldn't make too much of a difference. Baffled why they've made it so firm. I have a ten-year-old Vortex Crossfire II and the wheel is fairly firm, but nowhere near as firm as the Viper.
So I thought I'd try the Kowa BD II 10x42. I've seen it mentioned quite a lot here (the 8x models too), so thought I'd give it a go. The upshot is that I've decided to stick with the Viper and I think the focus wheel is something I'll get used to. It's bothering me less and less - and it's perhaps a minor negative alongside the superb optical image. Really clear, sharp, fairly flat.
I don't get on with the Kowa, for the following reasons. The image is not as neutral, it's warmer-looking. And at long distances (about 300 yards) I struggle to get things in focus (not because of shake). Or maybe things are in focus, but the image quality is not as good as the Viper. Also, while the eye relief is almost the same as the Viper, the eye-cups on the Kowa are slightly less deep and I occasionally see black areas. The Viper is also of a higher build quality, I think - reflected in the slightly higher price.
The field of view is a little wider on the Kowa, but not much, and I enjoy using the Viper far, far more. (I'm trying them at home. I live overlooking fields, hedgerows and hills.)
But perhaps most disappointingly with the Kowa, for me, considering my expectations and the reason for trying it, is the focus wheel. It's barely any looser than the Viper. It's a nicer wheel in a way because fingers grip more easily to the metal, compared with the Viper. But why Kowa and Viper make the wheels so firm is beyond me. Many don't seem to find the Kowa BD II's wheel too firm, so personal preference plays a part, of course.