British Birds Vol 100: pp481-486. (August 2007)
Photos of old bones that may be eagle owls and stuff like that.
a
Anyone got a link to a PDF for this or any other recent literature concerning EEO in GB?
Much appreciated,
Andy
British Birds Vol 100: pp481-486. (August 2007)
Photos of old bones that may be eagle owls and stuff like that.
a
And did anyone read the BB paper? Author reckons they should be considered native but evidence since the last ice age seems a bit thin....
a
Interestingly, in the same issue is the article on the history of WTE in lowland Britian, using evidence such as place names to map their possible distribution. It's interesting that there is so much evidence for WTE, but just 1 lonely bone for EO in the same period...
Any sightings yet this spring?
Are they courting yet?
Here's hoping.
Thanks for your time and trouble.
Be lucky
David
Interestingly, in the same issue is the article on the history of WTE in lowland Britian, using evidence such as place names to map their possible distribution. It's interesting that there is so much evidence for WTE, but just 1 lonely bone for EO in the same period...
Rumour has it that they have been done away with.
The BB paper on WTE overstated the likelihood of a connection between place names and the presence of Eagles and rather ignored alternative explanations imo. Speculation at best. Not evidence.
But the lack of EO remains/evidence at a number of sites is compelling evidence in itself
Rumour has it that they have been done away with.
No it isn't evidence of anything. It's just interesting speculation.
Well I hope you have understand may message, let birds live free./QUOTE]
I agree with you Harald, birds should fly free.
Unfortunately, as a species man has messed-up big-time in our nature management and we are still continuingly doing so. Trying to correct our past mistakes is an emotive discussion.
I don’t like to see WTSE’s removed Norway, but at least when they are released in Scotland they are free.
Compare this to the Peregrines, which are captured and given to falconers.
The success of the WTSE Mull birds must give us hope that at last we are moving towards the correct outcome.
The EO’s are another argument altogether, I’m in favour of just leaving them alone.
Agreed, hence it was in BB and not Bird Study, I'd wager.
But the lack of EO remains/evidence at a number of sites is compelling evidence in itself, I'd protest.
Farnborough John, it's hard to imagine that EO wouldn't feature at human settlements, as art or remains, when so many other species do, from Otter to Cormorant to Boar. Bird remains are common at many settlements and sites, from caves to middens to wetland sites. Flixborough alone generated 22,000 items of bird bones. There is no way of telling whether the single post ice-age bone mentioned in the BB article was imported or from a native bird. Importation has to be a distinct possibility, dead or alive. Also, it's not wholly convincing whether the bone was a snowy owl or eagle owl.