BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Peter Kovalik" data-source="post: 3536623" data-attributes="member: 80630">‘Orange-billed terns’J. Martin Collinson; Paul Dufour; Abdulmaula A. Hamza; Yvonne Lawrie; Michael Elliott ... When morphology is not reflected by molecular phylogeny: the case of three ‘orange-billed terns’ Thalasseus maximus, Thalasseus bergii and Thalasseus bengalensis (Charadriiformes: Laridae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, Advance Access, Published:  10 March 2017.<a href="https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/advance-access" target="_blank">Abstract</a>:In order to elucidate genetic structure within the royal tern Thalasseus maximus, genetic analyses and phylogenetic reconstructions were performed on royal terns Thalasseus maximus albididorsalis from the West African breeding population and compared with sequences from American populations Thalasseus maximus maximus. The analysis shows that royal tern as currently defined is a paraphyletic species: West African royal tern is genetically distinct from American breeding populations of the nominate subspecies and forms part of a genetic cluster with lesser crested terns Thalasseus bengalensis (of all subspecies) and greater crested terns Thalasseus bergii. This represents the first published analysis of the genetic relationship between the two subspecies of royal terns, suggests that the West African population should be treated as a distinct species, and provides support to previous studies suggesting that morphological and genetic similarities are poorly correlated in the genus Thalasseus. Conservation and taxonomic implications are discussed.</blockquote>

Verification