Certainly witrh regard to vulpinus, nobody is sure of the limits or hybrid zones, a real challenge for sure.This will have been proposed as part of the movement towards a single list. I suspect that the reason why it has taken longer to be even proposed by the IOC than many of the other splits and lumps that have occurred since the last Cornell/eBird update is that it is harder to justify right now.
Buteo remains a mess and we certainly haven't heard the last about species limits in this genus.
Not of much use to listers unless the islands open to foreigners?Nov 30 Revise the proposed split of Orange-breasted Fig Parrot into three, not four, species.
Nov 28 Accept split of Black-billed Hanging Parrot from Philippine Hanging Parrot.
The vast majority of the splits over the last few years might as well be on Mars as far as I'm concerned 🥴Not of much use to listers unless the islands open to foreigners?
Yes, for now. javanica has priority and they usually do the same with common names in instances like this. Both names are a bit rubbish tbh. In an era where we are moving away from patronyms, Horsfield's should be deprecated. While Singing is no help at all- Is there a lark that doesn't sing?Does the wording mean that the result will be Horsefield's? Because Singing Bush Lark is a nice name, would be a shame to loose it to yet another Horsefield's bird.
There has been plenty of cases where this was not the case, for example splits where the common name did not go with the nominate form.Yes, for now. javanica has priority and they usually do the same with common names in instances like this. Both names are a bit rubbish tbh. In an era where we are moving away from patronyms, Horsfield's should be deprecated. While Singing is no help at all- Is there a lark that doesn't sing?
For lumps though? I also said usually.There has been plenty of cases where this was not the case, for example splits where the common name did not go with the nominate form.
Niels
Please behave.Surely the sole purpose of using Horsfield's Bush Lark is to upset the ornithowokes? I don't remember Horsfield being a slaver, or a mass murderer, or someone who didn't like dogs.
Shouldn't it only concern American species bearing patronyms of North American personalities?In an era where we are moving away from patronyms, Horsfield's should be deprecated.
The same reasoning that could be used for the New World species almost certainly could apply to any part of the world with a history of colonialism associated with scientific discovery. Whether or not there is any movement in those other areas is another question.Shouldn't it only concern American species bearing patronyms of North American personalities?