What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Leica Ultravid 8x32 HD Plus review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chosun Juan" data-source="post: 3332178" data-attributes="member: 92780"><p>CF, The brightness per se' should not be affected by the baffling, unless as Mark says the truncating of the exit pupil is due to that and the eye's pupil is at 4mm and thus the transmitted area is affected. The truncation is rather more likely in concert with other causes like prisms, field stops, alignment, etc, which should not affect the absolute centre say 2mm. I think it's always hard to get an accurate photograph of both exit pupils at the same time unless using a powerful telephoto set-up at great distance to approximate the parallel lightpaths. |8.| One at a time might give a better representation of any truncation the eye would see in actual use. </p><p></p><p>Certainly if the eye's pupil is at 4mm then the truncation shown (due to whatever cause) would indeed reduce the brightness. Contrast and colour reproduction will be independent of brightness on a transmitted level (user perceptions and preference might be another matter though). I was not aware that the x42mm UVHD+ colour reproduction <em>needed</em> 'improving'? in the the 32mm - in fact from all reports the 42mm has done quite nicely having a lively 'sparkle' to the view. I also think it's a bit OTT to describe Swarovski's design compromise choices as <em>"horrible" "mistakes"</em>, especially given the ER and ease of view benefits which the little Leica can't even get close to looking at (just ask Beth! :-C ).</p><p></p><p>What interested me was Tobias's comment that <em>"The 8x32 Ultravid at daylight used <strong>with closed pupil</strong> is visibly darker than the 8x42 Ultravid"</em> ..... once the eye's pupil is constricted below say 3.5mm to cut out any truncation effects then the brightness should be pretty similar if not greater in the smaller 32mm. His observations seem to be backed up by the grey scale photographs comparing the two formats. :h?:</p><p></p><p>Thoughts people, on this brightness thingo ?? ....... :cat: </p><p></p><p></p><p>Chosun :gh:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chosun Juan, post: 3332178, member: 92780"] CF, The brightness per se' should not be affected by the baffling, unless as Mark says the truncating of the exit pupil is due to that and the eye's pupil is at 4mm and thus the transmitted area is affected. The truncation is rather more likely in concert with other causes like prisms, field stops, alignment, etc, which should not affect the absolute centre say 2mm. I think it's always hard to get an accurate photograph of both exit pupils at the same time unless using a powerful telephoto set-up at great distance to approximate the parallel lightpaths. |8.| One at a time might give a better representation of any truncation the eye would see in actual use. Certainly if the eye's pupil is at 4mm then the truncation shown (due to whatever cause) would indeed reduce the brightness. Contrast and colour reproduction will be independent of brightness on a transmitted level (user perceptions and preference might be another matter though). I was not aware that the x42mm UVHD+ colour reproduction [I]needed[/I] 'improving'? in the the 32mm - in fact from all reports the 42mm has done quite nicely having a lively 'sparkle' to the view. I also think it's a bit OTT to describe Swarovski's design compromise choices as [I]"horrible" "mistakes"[/I], especially given the ER and ease of view benefits which the little Leica can't even get close to looking at (just ask Beth! :-C ). What interested me was Tobias's comment that [I]"The 8x32 Ultravid at daylight used [B]with closed pupil[/B] is visibly darker than the 8x42 Ultravid"[/I] ..... once the eye's pupil is constricted below say 3.5mm to cut out any truncation effects then the brightness should be pretty similar if not greater in the smaller 32mm. His observations seem to be backed up by the grey scale photographs comparing the two formats. :h?: Thoughts people, on this brightness thingo ?? ....... :cat: Chosun :gh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Leica Ultravid 8x32 HD Plus review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top