What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Leica Ultravid 8x32 HD Plus review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chosun Juan" data-source="post: 3377487" data-attributes="member: 92780"><p>Hey Solo,</p><p></p><p>Try not to be too freaked out by flat-field designs and any propensity they have for exhibiting the 'rolling ball' phenomena when viewing, purely by reading alone. In reality, less than ~20% of people will have a problem, and not all of those would be deal breakers. You really have to view them for yourself to see how they gel with your eyes/brain.</p><p></p><p>Swarovski has been widely thought to have 'tweaked' their optical distortion formulas in recent years to make them more friendly to more people.</p><p></p><p>I would also caution that some reports contradict what Lee has said about the SF ...... ie while the field is indeed 'milder' in that it isn't as sharp to the edge, any translation of that into reduced RB effect has turned out to be more marketing than reality with some people bothered by RB in the SF that have no problem with it in the SV ...... It really will be important to eyeball them all yourself.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Chosun :gh:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chosun Juan, post: 3377487, member: 92780"] Hey Solo, Try not to be too freaked out by flat-field designs and any propensity they have for exhibiting the 'rolling ball' phenomena when viewing, purely by reading alone. In reality, less than ~20% of people will have a problem, and not all of those would be deal breakers. You really have to view them for yourself to see how they gel with your eyes/brain. Swarovski has been widely thought to have 'tweaked' their optical distortion formulas in recent years to make them more friendly to more people. I would also caution that some reports contradict what Lee has said about the SF ...... ie while the field is indeed 'milder' in that it isn't as sharp to the edge, any translation of that into reduced RB effect has turned out to be more marketing than reality with some people bothered by RB in the SF that have no problem with it in the SV ...... It really will be important to eyeball them all yourself. Chosun :gh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Leica Ultravid 8x32 HD Plus review
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top