What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Lens for photograph birds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Roy C" data-source="post: 1426856" data-attributes="member: 18798"><p>I am with you on Raw being a advantage which is why I use it myself <strong>BUT</strong> the assumption made that a Raw shot must be sharper than a jpeg is just not true IMO it depends on how much or how little sharpening <strong>you</strong> decide to do. I stand by my statement that straight out of the Camera a Raw will be softer than a jpeg (unless the jpeg shooter has turned off all sharpening which I suggest is rarely done). Remember even a jpeg can be sharpened more in processing if required so how anyone can come to the conclusion that a Raw will be sharper than a jpeg is beyond me - maybe I am missing something !</p><p>There have been a few threads on BF recently where people have used Raw for the first time and have been surprised that the results are not so good as their jpegs. What they have done is to merely convert the Raw, crop and resize and then compared results with a jpeg. My point was that there is nothing magical about shooting in Raw unless you are prepared to process the shot how you want it.</p><p>It seems to me that a lot of people who shoot in jpeg do so because they do not want to do much,if anything at all in the way of processing and that is fair enough. for a lot of folk the less time they have to spend on a PC the better - I am not knocking that, each to their own.</p><p></p><p>I guess my comment on having to know the finer points of processing was a bit over the top as you are right that on a lot of shots you do not have to do too much in Raw and once you get used to Raw work flow it need not take much time. I was thinking of things like selective sharpening, tweaking the highlights/shadows and selective noise reduction etc which comes as second nature to some but a lot of folk would find daunting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Roy C, post: 1426856, member: 18798"] I am with you on Raw being a advantage which is why I use it myself [B]BUT[/B] the assumption made that a Raw shot must be sharper than a jpeg is just not true IMO it depends on how much or how little sharpening [B]you[/B] decide to do. I stand by my statement that straight out of the Camera a Raw will be softer than a jpeg (unless the jpeg shooter has turned off all sharpening which I suggest is rarely done). Remember even a jpeg can be sharpened more in processing if required so how anyone can come to the conclusion that a Raw will be sharper than a jpeg is beyond me - maybe I am missing something ! There have been a few threads on BF recently where people have used Raw for the first time and have been surprised that the results are not so good as their jpegs. What they have done is to merely convert the Raw, crop and resize and then compared results with a jpeg. My point was that there is nothing magical about shooting in Raw unless you are prepared to process the shot how you want it. It seems to me that a lot of people who shoot in jpeg do so because they do not want to do much,if anything at all in the way of processing and that is fair enough. for a lot of folk the less time they have to spend on a PC the better - I am not knocking that, each to their own. I guess my comment on having to know the finer points of processing was a bit over the top as you are right that on a lot of shots you do not have to do too much in Raw and once you get used to Raw work flow it need not take much time. I was thinking of things like selective sharpening, tweaking the highlights/shadows and selective noise reduction etc which comes as second nature to some but a lot of folk would find daunting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Lens for photograph birds
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top