What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Lens protection
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tdodd" data-source="post: 1216894" data-attributes="member: 55450"><p>I just shot a series of three test shots with my 100-400 at 400mm, 1/1600 and f/5.6 on a tripod. Subject distance was approx 10m - a realistic working distance for this lens. I used Live View and focused manually to get the best focus I could and, using the 10 second timer, fired a shot with no filter. Without changing any of the setup I then screwed on my Hoya Pro 1 Digital UV filter and fired off another shot.</p><p> </p><p>I compared results on my laptop and saw a distinct deterioration in IQ with the filter attached. Wondering whether the filter might have caused a focus shift I tried refocusing manually with Live View and 10X magnification, and fired off a third shot, again with the 10 second timer.</p><p> </p><p>I have attached 100% crops of the raw files with no sharpening at all. These were shot in neutral picture style, with camera sharpening parameter set to 0, and these are straight crop and convert jpegs.</p><p> </p><p>If you look at the fine text of the password "WINEBANK" I think the deterioration is quite evident.</p><p> </p><p>The fourth image is the bare lens without filter, but with sharpening set to 3 in DPP and picture style changed to Standard. The fifth image is the shot with the filter attached and manually refocused and again sharpened and with Standard Picture Style.</p><p> </p><p>Image 1 - no filter, unsharpened</p><p>Image 2 - filter added, not refocused, unsharpened</p><p>Image 3 - filter added, refocused, unsharpened</p><p>Image 4 - as image 1 but sharpened</p><p>Image 5 - as image 3 but sharpened</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tdodd, post: 1216894, member: 55450"] I just shot a series of three test shots with my 100-400 at 400mm, 1/1600 and f/5.6 on a tripod. Subject distance was approx 10m - a realistic working distance for this lens. I used Live View and focused manually to get the best focus I could and, using the 10 second timer, fired a shot with no filter. Without changing any of the setup I then screwed on my Hoya Pro 1 Digital UV filter and fired off another shot. I compared results on my laptop and saw a distinct deterioration in IQ with the filter attached. Wondering whether the filter might have caused a focus shift I tried refocusing manually with Live View and 10X magnification, and fired off a third shot, again with the 10 second timer. I have attached 100% crops of the raw files with no sharpening at all. These were shot in neutral picture style, with camera sharpening parameter set to 0, and these are straight crop and convert jpegs. If you look at the fine text of the password "WINEBANK" I think the deterioration is quite evident. The fourth image is the bare lens without filter, but with sharpening set to 3 in DPP and picture style changed to Standard. The fifth image is the shot with the filter attached and manually refocused and again sharpened and with Standard Picture Style. Image 1 - no filter, unsharpened Image 2 - filter added, not refocused, unsharpened Image 3 - filter added, refocused, unsharpened Image 4 - as image 1 but sharpened Image 5 - as image 3 but sharpened [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Canon
Lens protection
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top