• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Lesser Black-backed Gull subspecies? (1 Viewer)

ACO

Well-known member
I took these two photos at Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, Virginia, USA in late November 2010.
I thought the mantle color was pretty dark for our regularly occuring subspecies and wanted to see what others thought?

Another thing that really stood out to me was also how bright the yellow was on the legs- not real apparent in these shots, but obvious from a long distance even through heat shimmer.

Sincerely,

Peter
 

Attachments

  • LBBG-flying Chincoteague Nov2010.jpg
    LBBG-flying Chincoteague Nov2010.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 112
  • LBBG-1 Chincoteague Nov2010.jpg
    LBBG-1 Chincoteague Nov2010.jpg
    25.2 KB · Views: 133
hi peter,

darkness of upperparts is not really visible in these pics as there's no comparison to other LBBG. but it looks pale enough to be a graellsii. 2 large mirrors support this ID although the (only) other contender intermedius can have an apreciable p9 mirror too. since intermedius can be rel. pale (maybe not as pale as palest graellsii) but also black, this subsp. is hard to exclude, neither is the so called "dutch intergrade", which is slightly darker than british and islandic birds are. still, there is quite some variation in upperparts tone so this would well be within ssp. graellsii.

regards,
 
Hi Lou,
Thanks for your thoughts. There were four LBBG present and they all appeared to be the same level of darkness on the mantle. I was using the comparison between the primary tips to the mantle for getting an idea of the darkness of the mantle.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 13 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top