What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Lesser Golden Plover
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="l_raty" data-source="post: 3237908" data-attributes="member: 24811"><p>[<a href="http://www.researchgate.net/publication/277312866" target="_blank">pdf</a>]</p><p></p><p>The name, as published here, is unquestionably a <em>nomen nudum</em> due to a total absence of explicit type fixation.</p><p>(Not to mention that "<em>johnsoni</em> in honor of two long-term students of the species" is in breach of Art. 31.1 [the genitive should have been plural, eg. <em>johnsonorum</em>], which would probably once more elicit infinite disputes about the "correct" OS.)</p><p>Additionally, there is a fair number of later names that apply to this species and have type localities that are not in the Pacific Islands (see for example <a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14032102" target="_blank">Hartert 1920</a>), and it seems also somewhat surprising that there was no attempt to check whether one of these might apply.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="l_raty, post: 3237908, member: 24811"] [[URL="http://www.researchgate.net/publication/277312866"]pdf[/URL]] The name, as published here, is unquestionably a [I]nomen nudum[/I] due to a total absence of explicit type fixation. (Not to mention that "[I]johnsoni[/I] in honor of two long-term students of the species" is in breach of Art. 31.1 [the genitive should have been plural, eg. [I]johnsonorum[/I]], which would probably once more elicit infinite disputes about the "correct" OS.) Additionally, there is a fair number of later names that apply to this species and have type localities that are not in the Pacific Islands (see for example [URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14032102"]Hartert 1920[/URL]), and it seems also somewhat surprising that there was no attempt to check whether one of these might apply. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Lesser Golden Plover
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top