What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Opus Discussion
Opus Discussion Area
Little Shearwater
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richard Klim" data-source="post: 1683393" data-attributes="member: 773"><p>Sorry Niels, I obviously misread the earlier posts. My comment was alluding to Onley & Scofield 2007, who argue that contra Austin <em>et al</em> 2004 and Sangster <em>et al</em> 2005, <em>boydi</em> appears closer to <em>lherminieri</em> than to <em>baroli</em> (thus splitting <em>P baroli</em>, but treating <em>boydi</em> as a subspecies of <em>P lherminieri</em>). I have no firm opinion either way, but given the uncertainty in the affinities of <em>boydi</em> I was just suggesting that it's probably safest either to split both <em>P baroli</em> and <em>P boydi</em>, or to treat both as subspecies of <em>P lherminieri</em>.</p><p></p><p>Richard</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richard Klim, post: 1683393, member: 773"] Sorry Niels, I obviously misread the earlier posts. My comment was alluding to Onley & Scofield 2007, who argue that contra Austin [I]et al[/I] 2004 and Sangster [I]et al[/I] 2005, [I]boydi[/I] appears closer to [I]lherminieri[/I] than to [I]baroli[/I] (thus splitting [I]P baroli[/I], but treating [I]boydi[/I] as a subspecies of [I]P lherminieri[/I]). I have no firm opinion either way, but given the uncertainty in the affinities of [I]boydi[/I] I was just suggesting that it's probably safest either to split both [I]P baroli[/I] and [I]P boydi[/I], or to treat both as subspecies of [I]P lherminieri[/I]. Richard [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Opus Discussion
Opus Discussion Area
Little Shearwater
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top
