What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Lynx - Bird Families of the World
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jim M." data-source="post: 3344970" data-attributes="member: 60675"><p>Received my copy a week ago from Buteo Books. It only recently became available from US vendors. Quite pleased overall (except with the unappealing dust cover art).</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p> Yes, putting Crested Jay (they use the name Shrike-jay) in a monotypic family, is arguably the biggest surprise in family-level taxonomy. In a quick check of online sources I could not find any precedent for that in global taxonomies. For those interested, to gauge how novel the family-level taxonomy is, <strong>I have put together a quick list of family lumps/splits adopted in the book that are accepted by <em>neither</em> Clements/eBird nor IOC as of now</strong>. Interestingly, all and only lumps are in the non-passerines, and all and only splits are in the passerines:</p><p> </p><p> <u>Non-passerines</u></p><p> Dromaiidae (Emus) lumped with Casuariidae (Cassowaries)</p><p> Pelecanoididae (Diving-Petrels) lumped with Procellariidae (Petrels)</p><p> Bucorvidae (Ground Hornbills) lumped with Bucerotidae (Hornbills)</p><p> Psittacalidae (Old World Parrots) lumped with Psittacidae (Parrots)</p><p> </p><p> <u>Passerines</u> (splits)</p><p> Falcunclidae (Shrike-tits)</p><p> Platylophidae (Shrike-jay) (monotypic)</p><p> Rhodinocichlidae (Thrush-Tanager) (monotypic)</p><p> Passerellidae (New World sparrows)</p><p> Zeledonidae (Wren-thrush) (monotypic)</p><p> Teretristidae (Cuban warblers)</p><p> Phaenicophilidae (Hispaniolan tanagers)</p><p> Spindalidae (Stripe-headed tanagers)</p><p> Neospringidae (Puerto Rican tanager) (monotypic)</p><p> Calyptophilidae (Chat-tanagers) (endemic to Hispaniola)</p><p> Mitrospingidae (Dusky-faced Tanager & allies)</p><p> </p><p> As a book owner, I do not mind the fairly aggressive splitting, because that provides me with more information. The four new monotypic families seem a bit much, however. Though they opted to be conservative with respect to Tyrannidae, opting to maintain the most species rich family as a single unit.</p><p> </p><p> One aspect of the book I found a bit confusing is the inclusion of an article at the beginning titled “Three new bird family names.” The names at issue are Chaetopidae (Rockjumpers), Hylocitreidae (Olive-flanked Whistler), Modulatricidae (Spot-throat & allies). However, I believe these names have been employed by IOC and/or Clements for at least a few years, so they are not new. The article eventually acknowledges that the only thing new that they are providing is a formal description; certainly valuable, but not sure I understand why they thought it necessary to include it in a book of this type.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jim M., post: 3344970, member: 60675"] Received my copy a week ago from Buteo Books. It only recently became available from US vendors. Quite pleased overall (except with the unappealing dust cover art). Yes, putting Crested Jay (they use the name Shrike-jay) in a monotypic family, is arguably the biggest surprise in family-level taxonomy. In a quick check of online sources I could not find any precedent for that in global taxonomies. For those interested, to gauge how novel the family-level taxonomy is, [B]I have put together a quick list of family lumps/splits adopted in the book that are accepted by [I]neither[/I] Clements/eBird nor IOC as of now[/B]. Interestingly, all and only lumps are in the non-passerines, and all and only splits are in the passerines: [U]Non-passerines[/U] Dromaiidae (Emus) lumped with Casuariidae (Cassowaries) Pelecanoididae (Diving-Petrels) lumped with Procellariidae (Petrels) Bucorvidae (Ground Hornbills) lumped with Bucerotidae (Hornbills) Psittacalidae (Old World Parrots) lumped with Psittacidae (Parrots) [U]Passerines[/U] (splits) Falcunclidae (Shrike-tits) Platylophidae (Shrike-jay) (monotypic) Rhodinocichlidae (Thrush-Tanager) (monotypic) Passerellidae (New World sparrows) Zeledonidae (Wren-thrush) (monotypic) Teretristidae (Cuban warblers) Phaenicophilidae (Hispaniolan tanagers) Spindalidae (Stripe-headed tanagers) Neospringidae (Puerto Rican tanager) (monotypic) Calyptophilidae (Chat-tanagers) (endemic to Hispaniola) Mitrospingidae (Dusky-faced Tanager & allies) As a book owner, I do not mind the fairly aggressive splitting, because that provides me with more information. The four new monotypic families seem a bit much, however. Though they opted to be conservative with respect to Tyrannidae, opting to maintain the most species rich family as a single unit. One aspect of the book I found a bit confusing is the inclusion of an article at the beginning titled “Three new bird family names.” The names at issue are Chaetopidae (Rockjumpers), Hylocitreidae (Olive-flanked Whistler), Modulatricidae (Spot-throat & allies). However, I believe these names have been employed by IOC and/or Clements for at least a few years, so they are not new. The article eventually acknowledges that the only thing new that they are providing is a formal description; certainly valuable, but not sure I understand why they thought it necessary to include it in a book of this type. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Lynx - Bird Families of the World
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top