What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Major Changes in UK Copyright Law - Must Read
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Overread" data-source="post: 1736203" data-attributes="member: 68571"><p>Aye - for the average amateur its not a real problem in the same way it is fro a working professional. The amateur often is just happy to be printed and the loss of potential earnings is almost not a concern because it was never a potential income source that was present before the theft (which however does NOT make it any less of a theft). Even if they are not attributed as the photographer they still get a little something from it.</p><p></p><p>However for your working professional its a deathcry - since now the lower price boundary for the working pro is £0. Even in good financial times companies will skimp and save where they can and if they can cut their photography budget they will - and the working pros feel the pinch.</p><p></p><p>Up till now however the pinch has been that the company performing the theft can be bitten if the owner of the image demands payment and/or sues them. So it was a risky thing and thus not encourage overly. However this new law makes it perfectly possible for them to commit the theft - perform a flase search and thus get away with it. The amateur has little to no comeback not sting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Overread, post: 1736203, member: 68571"] Aye - for the average amateur its not a real problem in the same way it is fro a working professional. The amateur often is just happy to be printed and the loss of potential earnings is almost not a concern because it was never a potential income source that was present before the theft (which however does NOT make it any less of a theft). Even if they are not attributed as the photographer they still get a little something from it. However for your working professional its a deathcry - since now the lower price boundary for the working pro is £0. Even in good financial times companies will skimp and save where they can and if they can cut their photography budget they will - and the working pros feel the pinch. Up till now however the pinch has been that the company performing the theft can be bitten if the owner of the image demands payment and/or sues them. So it was a risky thing and thus not encourage overly. However this new law makes it perfectly possible for them to commit the theft - perform a flase search and thus get away with it. The amateur has little to no comeback not sting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Major Changes in UK Copyright Law - Must Read
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top