What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Live Bird News from around the World
Malta and hunting policy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MJB" data-source="post: 2229096" data-attributes="member: 88928"><p>What a transparently self-serving, cynical and pompous statement, made without regard or understanding of how hunting is regulated or monitored (however imperfectly) elsewhere in much of Europe!</p><p></p><p>The marker is not "the traditional socio-cultural passion of Maltese hunters and trappers", it is whether that 'tradition' is a good tradition or a bad tradition, when measured against reasonable opinions reached through debate and published regulation in a free society. It's all too common a ploy to raise the spectre of 'tradition' as a thinkstop instead of offering it for a judgement call.</p><p></p><p>The linking of 'hunting' with 'trapping' as a <em>fait accompli</em> should be challenged on every turn. 'Trapping' for non-research purposes (the Japanese have made it a career option in their whaling argument) where any bird species has not been declared an official pest, is unsupportable in any modern context. 'Hunting' in the Mediterranean usually has little to do with any hunting skills, as Adam W attempts to explain so often.</p><p></p><p>FKNK's statement is extraordinarily feeble, <u>and they don't have the faintest awareness of the fact</u>. I apologise if I might have inadvertently made them realise that their declaration is laughable (except perhaps to a bureaucrat), and would be considered very much a failure by the average debater of any experience.</p><p></p><p>FKNK's assumption that BirdLife Malta have an executive role in 'leading the Maltese Government by the nose' is yet another example of how evidence terrifies the irrational, who have only one response - the schoolboy reaction of calling the opposition names! </p><p>MJB</p><p>PS 'Extremist ends' - cessation of killing of birds and introducing a protected future for migrants as opposed to thousands of guns blasting away annually? Even the Eurovision Song Contest voting wouldn't support the latter over the former, would it? Mr Ferrugia, if the cap fits, wear it!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MJB, post: 2229096, member: 88928"] What a transparently self-serving, cynical and pompous statement, made without regard or understanding of how hunting is regulated or monitored (however imperfectly) elsewhere in much of Europe! The marker is not "the traditional socio-cultural passion of Maltese hunters and trappers", it is whether that 'tradition' is a good tradition or a bad tradition, when measured against reasonable opinions reached through debate and published regulation in a free society. It's all too common a ploy to raise the spectre of 'tradition' as a thinkstop instead of offering it for a judgement call. The linking of 'hunting' with 'trapping' as a [I]fait accompli[/I] should be challenged on every turn. 'Trapping' for non-research purposes (the Japanese have made it a career option in their whaling argument) where any bird species has not been declared an official pest, is unsupportable in any modern context. 'Hunting' in the Mediterranean usually has little to do with any hunting skills, as Adam W attempts to explain so often. FKNK's statement is extraordinarily feeble, [U]and they don't have the faintest awareness of the fact[/U]. I apologise if I might have inadvertently made them realise that their declaration is laughable (except perhaps to a bureaucrat), and would be considered very much a failure by the average debater of any experience. FKNK's assumption that BirdLife Malta have an executive role in 'leading the Maltese Government by the nose' is yet another example of how evidence terrifies the irrational, who have only one response - the schoolboy reaction of calling the opposition names! MJB PS 'Extremist ends' - cessation of killing of birds and introducing a protected future for migrants as opposed to thousands of guns blasting away annually? Even the Eurovision Song Contest voting wouldn't support the latter over the former, would it? Mr Ferrugia, if the cap fits, wear it! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Live Bird News from around the World
Malta and hunting policy
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top