What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Marsh Warbler? or ? - Holme, Norfolk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mike Toms" data-source="post: 1298475" data-attributes="member: 69629"><p>Thanks to Penny for posting these images and for everybody who has contributed to the debate about this bird. Over the last week we have been canvassing the views of a number of colleagues, both at the BTO and more widely across Europe. Like us, others feel that this is an interesting bird and not necessarily a clear-cut Reed or Marsh. I should say at this point that the bird was never claimed in the field as a Marsh Warbler (nor even a possible Marsh Warbler) but merely caught our eye as being interesting. While it did not strike us as a clear candidate for Marsh it was not your typical 1w Reed and this is what prompted us to spend some time watching the bird, drawing others to subsequently watch and photograph the bird.</p><p></p><p>The general consensus of the folk we have shown the images to is that this bird is a Reed but not a clear cut one. There have been some exceptions to this consensus, including from experienced observers who have handled a good number of both species, with some going for Marsh and others for Reed. </p><p></p><p>However, reasons for doubts over the bird being a Marsh are (i) that it seems short-winged for Marsh, (ii) the bill is too short and not broad enough for Marsh, (iii) leg and claw colour are not pale enough and (iv) the colouring is not olive-grey enough. </p><p></p><p>The characteristics suggestive of Marsh in the field were head shape (nice and round and more open than the pointy features of Reed), wing length/primary projection, colour of the flanks and general colouration (the bird being pale and concolourous from rump to nape when seen in dead light). </p><p></p><p>Colouration is a less reliable feature in the field, and seems to be where the greatest degree of overlap can occur between the two species, with clinal variation in Reed Warbler colour noted across the range. Similarly, leg colouration can be variable in autumn. Penny's photographs allow the bird to be examined more readily and for structural characteristics to be examined at a more leisurely pace.</p><p></p><p>In conclusion then, we'd go with a Reed Warbler, possibly from the eastern part of the range. Thanks to everyone who has contributed to the debate.</p><p></p><p>Mike Toms</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mike Toms, post: 1298475, member: 69629"] Thanks to Penny for posting these images and for everybody who has contributed to the debate about this bird. Over the last week we have been canvassing the views of a number of colleagues, both at the BTO and more widely across Europe. Like us, others feel that this is an interesting bird and not necessarily a clear-cut Reed or Marsh. I should say at this point that the bird was never claimed in the field as a Marsh Warbler (nor even a possible Marsh Warbler) but merely caught our eye as being interesting. While it did not strike us as a clear candidate for Marsh it was not your typical 1w Reed and this is what prompted us to spend some time watching the bird, drawing others to subsequently watch and photograph the bird. The general consensus of the folk we have shown the images to is that this bird is a Reed but not a clear cut one. There have been some exceptions to this consensus, including from experienced observers who have handled a good number of both species, with some going for Marsh and others for Reed. However, reasons for doubts over the bird being a Marsh are (i) that it seems short-winged for Marsh, (ii) the bill is too short and not broad enough for Marsh, (iii) leg and claw colour are not pale enough and (iv) the colouring is not olive-grey enough. The characteristics suggestive of Marsh in the field were head shape (nice and round and more open than the pointy features of Reed), wing length/primary projection, colour of the flanks and general colouration (the bird being pale and concolourous from rump to nape when seen in dead light). Colouration is a less reliable feature in the field, and seems to be where the greatest degree of overlap can occur between the two species, with clinal variation in Reed Warbler colour noted across the range. Similarly, leg colouration can be variable in autumn. Penny's photographs allow the bird to be examined more readily and for structural characteristics to be examined at a more leisurely pace. In conclusion then, we'd go with a Reed Warbler, possibly from the eastern part of the range. Thanks to everyone who has contributed to the debate. Mike Toms [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Marsh Warbler? or ? - Holme, Norfolk
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top