Okay, I've allowed the off topic arguing to continue for long enough now. Probably too long. This appears to be a common theme of this forum. Someone will start a thread asking a question and it will quickly devolve into a few select members conducting petty arguments involving nitpicking and preferences.
Back to my original question, are The Mavens worth spending the extra money(~$800) on? For my occasional use but discriminating eye would I be better off getting the best I can afford (Maven) and being done with it for life? How strong is their lifetime warranty, being a new company? I worry about that.
If I do go budget is there anything I've overlooked? Many say the Bushnell Legend Ultra HD is the best under $500 or so.
By the way, thank you for all the replies. It is definitely possible that the indoor environment was skewing my perception of the binoculars. It was also brief viewing for each pair. I still stand by how underwhelmed I was by the Zeiss Terra and how I think the Pro Staff 7s look just as good or better and the terra are certainly not worth hundreds more. I was also able to easily see that the Zeiss Victory HT were one of the best pairs of binoculars they had, I think I preferred them to the Swarovski SLC. The Victory HT and Swarovski SLC were clearly in a different league than anything else I tried. I think that's the level of binoculars I'd like to own, and that's what led me to Maven. I'm just not sure I can easily justify spending that much when I'm not a birder. It will just be for occasional use, but I want to have the absolute best view when I do use them. I've never liked compromising when purchasing a tool.
One last question:
I just found the top of the line Opticron and I'm reading really good things. Does anyone know how these compare to the Maven B2s?