What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Mid-range vs. Second Tier
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gijs van Ginkel" data-source="post: 3369694" data-attributes="member: 82596"><p>Hermann, post 20,</p><p>From our data it shows that the SLC from 2010 was around 50 grams heavier than the 2015 sample and had a close focus of 1,8 m, which is increased to 2,8 m in the 2015 sample we have investigated. Furthermore the 2015 sample showed a small decrease in light transmission, but it was so small that it could also be attributed to sample variation. That alltogether brought us to the conclusion that there were no major chages between the 2010 ("old") SLC-HD and the 2015 sample ("new"SLC-WB).</p><p>My analysis (for what it is worth) is, that Swarovski made a tactical/calculated decision by giving the new SLC a substantial lower price than the old SLC to compete with other lower priced binoculars of other brands and one of it is certainly the Leica Ultravid or the Ultravid HD-plus.</p><p>Gijs van Ginkel</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gijs van Ginkel, post: 3369694, member: 82596"] Hermann, post 20, From our data it shows that the SLC from 2010 was around 50 grams heavier than the 2015 sample and had a close focus of 1,8 m, which is increased to 2,8 m in the 2015 sample we have investigated. Furthermore the 2015 sample showed a small decrease in light transmission, but it was so small that it could also be attributed to sample variation. That alltogether brought us to the conclusion that there were no major chages between the 2010 ("old") SLC-HD and the 2015 sample ("new"SLC-WB). My analysis (for what it is worth) is, that Swarovski made a tactical/calculated decision by giving the new SLC a substantial lower price than the old SLC to compete with other lower priced binoculars of other brands and one of it is certainly the Leica Ultravid or the Ultravid HD-plus. Gijs van Ginkel [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Mid-range vs. Second Tier
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top