What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Midsize Binocular Shootout: Opticron Oregon 8x32 vs Sightron Blue Sky 8x32 vs MavenB3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pete_gamby" data-source="post: 3212445" data-attributes="member: 76050"><p>The numbers I gave are relative - if an Oregon were to cost us $100 ex-factory, an Opticron-branded version of the Sightron would cost us $90 (albeit from a different factory). Similarly, an Opticron-branded version of the Maven B3 would cost us 4.2 times as much as we pay for the Oregon. I can't really elaborate more on the forum without giving away too much information!!</p><p></p><p>The Sightron is phase coated, the Oregon is not which may account for much of the difference in optical performance. That also accounts for some of the difference in the price you can buy each one for.</p><p></p><p>Why would a better spec binocular cost less? That we can only speculate upon - maybe the guys at that particular factory negotiated their wages better or the boss is saving for a new Range Rover <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Cheers, Pete</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pete_gamby, post: 3212445, member: 76050"] The numbers I gave are relative - if an Oregon were to cost us $100 ex-factory, an Opticron-branded version of the Sightron would cost us $90 (albeit from a different factory). Similarly, an Opticron-branded version of the Maven B3 would cost us 4.2 times as much as we pay for the Oregon. I can't really elaborate more on the forum without giving away too much information!! The Sightron is phase coated, the Oregon is not which may account for much of the difference in optical performance. That also accounts for some of the difference in the price you can buy each one for. Why would a better spec binocular cost less? That we can only speculate upon - maybe the guys at that particular factory negotiated their wages better or the boss is saving for a new Range Rover :-) Cheers, Pete [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Midsize Binocular Shootout: Opticron Oregon 8x32 vs Sightron Blue Sky 8x32 vs MavenB3
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top