BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="dalat" data-source="post: 3148848" data-attributes="member: 65207">I had a thorough look now at these bags in a shop. The large Mindshiftgear Professional and the slimmer Panorama bag.Both are really well made amazing bags, which should be very useful for birders and outdoor photographers. The rotating belt pack feature works very well, the bags are of very good quality (to be expected, seen the price) and have a lot of well thought features. Especially the pro is packed with features and pockets.I didn't bought one (yet), because for me, the Pro is too large and the Panorama is too small.The Pro is really a huge bag, good for complete camera equipment and luggage for a long walk, even several days. A full sized scope fits (although a little awkwardly) in the upper compartment, a tripod can be comfortably attached to the side or the back of the bag.However, the bag is a bit too much for me, looking mainly for a day pack (and its too expensive for me to buy an oversized bag).The Panorama is a very nice day pack. It would be perfect for birding, if you move around in a car, where you have the tripod and the scope in the trunk, and then go birding with scope over the shoulder. The bag is then perfect to carry digiscoping cam or bridge cam readily accessible in the belt pack and rain jacket, food etc. in the upper compartment.I mostly move around with public transport, so would like to be able packing the scope in the bag and attaching the tripod to the bag. A large scope defintily does not fit in the bag. A tripod can be nicely be attached to the back of the bag, but I'd prefer to be able to attach a heavy tripod to the side of the bag, so the weight is closer to my back. This is possible in principle with the Panorama, but not very comfortably.The belt pack of the Panorama is also smaller than the one of the PRO, I had trouble to fit a bigger field guide (like the Collins) and a bridge camera (Lumix FZ 200) at the same time (it works, but not comfortably ). Could be a little larger.So for me, something inbetween these two bags would be perfect. Now I'm not sure if I should wait them to bring out such a bag (no idea if this is planned), or go for the Panorama anyway.</blockquote>

Verification