What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
Most bang for budget buck - Pro Optic 8 x 42 8.3 ED?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="birdazzLED" data-source="post: 1762716" data-attributes="member: 83781"><p><strong>the no review review (pro-optic and likely viking)</strong></p><p></p><p>Here's a video of the, seemingly, weak eye-cup. They appear to be aluminum. One thing that concerns me is it seems like many of the ED glass bins have a thin appearing look and this one feels especially fragile. In contrast the ZRS eye cups feel stronger and they appear to be thicker. I've never taken an eyecup apart so perhaps i'm just judging on the thickness of the rubber where the eyes meet, and the amount of play while extending the cups. Besides, until recently all my bins had fold downs. <a href="http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/4764/file4386.mp4" target="_blank">http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/4764/file4386.mp4</a></p><p></p><p>I don't like the rubber armoring as it's very thin and feels more like rubber foam. </p><p></p><p>It has a wider FOV but since it was badly out of collimation, I lost all interest looking through them, even with one eye. I will say that the one eye image didn't appear to be any sharper than the ZRS. If anything they were less sharp.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Overall, the build quality - well, it needs a lot of work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="birdazzLED, post: 1762716, member: 83781"] [b]the no review review (pro-optic and likely viking)[/b] Here's a video of the, seemingly, weak eye-cup. They appear to be aluminum. One thing that concerns me is it seems like many of the ED glass bins have a thin appearing look and this one feels especially fragile. In contrast the ZRS eye cups feel stronger and they appear to be thicker. I've never taken an eyecup apart so perhaps i'm just judging on the thickness of the rubber where the eyes meet, and the amount of play while extending the cups. Besides, until recently all my bins had fold downs. [url]http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/4764/file4386.mp4[/url] I don't like the rubber armoring as it's very thin and feels more like rubber foam. It has a wider FOV but since it was badly out of collimation, I lost all interest looking through them, even with one eye. I will say that the one eye image didn't appear to be any sharper than the ZRS. If anything they were less sharp. Overall, the build quality - well, it needs a lot of work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Others
Most bang for budget buck - Pro Optic 8 x 42 8.3 ED?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top