What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Museum collections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jurek" data-source="post: 3314724" data-attributes="member: 3357"><p>Perhaps museums could change how they obtain specimens?</p><p></p><p>- encourage public and birdwatchers to deposit casually found dead birds in collections. It is common to find dead birds in the field, and they could contribute to scientific research instead of just being left to rot. </p><p></p><p>- encourage preserving feathers and similar DNA samples of live and dead birds, as long as it is possible to do it ethically.</p><p></p><p>Today, detailed taxonomic study on a whole genome can be done on one feather of a living bird. In few years, such studies will almost certainly be very cheap and easy, because DNA sequencing in medicine is quickly developing.</p><p></p><p>One problem are restrictive laws which sometimes sweepingly regulate all animal specimens or all biological material. They are not in practice applied to things like bird feathers, but they put unnecessary confusion, don't match current reality and should be changed.</p><p></p><p>(I am waiting when somebody finds a new species of a bird from DNA sample in a feather, pellet or similar, with no knowledge how the whole bird looks like).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jurek, post: 3314724, member: 3357"] Perhaps museums could change how they obtain specimens? - encourage public and birdwatchers to deposit casually found dead birds in collections. It is common to find dead birds in the field, and they could contribute to scientific research instead of just being left to rot. - encourage preserving feathers and similar DNA samples of live and dead birds, as long as it is possible to do it ethically. Today, detailed taxonomic study on a whole genome can be done on one feather of a living bird. In few years, such studies will almost certainly be very cheap and easy, because DNA sequencing in medicine is quickly developing. One problem are restrictive laws which sometimes sweepingly regulate all animal specimens or all biological material. They are not in practice applied to things like bird feathers, but they put unnecessary confusion, don't match current reality and should be changed. (I am waiting when somebody finds a new species of a bird from DNA sample in a feather, pellet or similar, with no knowledge how the whole bird looks like). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Museum collections
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top