• BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

    Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

My 2008 Moth catches (1 Viewer)

Jos Stratford

Beast from the East
stay out of a thread when what you are talking about has no meaning in that thread. if you haven't learnt that after all these years then there's no hope.

Yep, clearly no hope for me, I raised an issue relating to the methods used in how you catch moths - the title is 'My 2008 Moth catches'. Seems fairly relevant, but maybe I am just a little lower in intellect.


You obviously you ARE trying to impose your thoughts on us.

If expressing a view is imposing a view, then I am sorry, I am guilty. However, it would seem that actively trying to exclude views by repeatedly telling someone to stay off a thread is closer to the title of imposing a one-sided view of things.


How lovely it is to have such a pleasant chat with you John.
 
Last edited:

MikeWall

HantsMoth-er
Jos, for the sake of inflaming things further, and to avoid a flame war, I'll respond in another thread when I get a chance to start one. John did set this up as a single-issue ID thread so to respect that we'll take the debate such as it is, elsewhere, good idea yes?

John, yes I do believe 2 & 3 are very heavily worn tineids: Niditinea etc.

Mike
 

Reader

Well-known member
I ran the trap from 21:45 to 03:15 last night. So far I have ID'd 350+ moths for 67 species and I have probably thirty or more still to ID.

For the first time I am feeling rather overwhelmed by so many moths that are catching me out. I will post a few images that may be a little easier than most to see what you think.

1. Can this be classed as Common Rustic or C R agg?
2. This looked like a Clay at first. Now I'm not so sure.
3. Euzophera pinguis?
4. Poss Dusky Brodcade
5. Poss Conobathra repandana

John
 

Attachments

  • Common Rustic agg 5247.jpg
    Common Rustic agg 5247.jpg
    127.8 KB · Views: 52
  • Probable Clay 5356.jpg
    Probable Clay 5356.jpg
    115.2 KB · Views: 43
  • Poss Euzophera pinguis 5312.jpg
    Poss Euzophera pinguis 5312.jpg
    96.1 KB · Views: 49
  • Poss Dusky Brodcade 5370.jpg
    Poss Dusky Brodcade 5370.jpg
    154.1 KB · Views: 51
  • Poss Conobathra repandana 5264.jpg
    Poss Conobathra repandana 5264.jpg
    124 KB · Views: 52

Surreybirder

Ken Noble
If those are the easy ones I'll pass on the rest ;)
I thought that the first was a clouded-bordered brindle, but I'm not sure.
I'd go with clay. Not sure what else it could be?
4 cabbage?
Ken
 
Last edited:

Reader

Well-known member
Hi Ken

They will get harder I can tell you.

I have got so caught up with the amount of different species that dropped in last night that I haven't looked as hard as I would have liked. I had take someone home at 4am and then only had a couple of hours sleep before I got up and started on what I had trapped.

Having another look at that Common Rustic I am pretty sure it's a Slender Brindle (which if it is is a new one for me).

Cabbage is possible for No.4 but I am not convinced.

How about anyone else. What's your thoughts?

John

If those are the easy ones I'll pass on the rest ;)
I thought that the first was a clouded-bordered brindle, but I'm not sure.
I'd go with clay. Not sure what else it could be?
4 cabbage?
Ken
 

Reader

Well-known member
Thanks Brian

I have never seen a Clay like that before. I have looked at all the sites, UK Moths, Hants Moths etc and none of them show the almost kidney shape that is on this moth. Have you ever caught one like that Brian?

Now for the next five.

1. Poss Agonopterix nervosa. The others (apart from A. assimilella) appear to be well out of their relevant flight times.
2. Poss Trachycera advenella
3. Poss Oak Nycteoline
4. Poss Grey Tortrix
5. Poss Bryotropha affinis

I still have 15 more that I am working on.

John

I agree with your id's (incl the revised ones).
 

Attachments

  • Agonopterix sp 5229.jpg
    Agonopterix sp 5229.jpg
    119.6 KB · Views: 40
  • Poss Trachycera advenella 5377.jpg
    Poss Trachycera advenella 5377.jpg
    108.1 KB · Views: 39
  • Poss Oak Nycteoline 5368.jpg
    Poss Oak Nycteoline 5368.jpg
    122.8 KB · Views: 40
  • Poss Grey Tortrix 5285.jpg
    Poss Grey Tortrix 5285.jpg
    99.7 KB · Views: 42
  • Poss Bryotropha affinis 5359.jpg
    Poss Bryotropha affinis 5359.jpg
    65.4 KB · Views: 39
Last edited:

Reader

Well-known member
Hi Brian

Thanks for the input.

For No.1 A. arenella. That was my original ID until I looked on both UK Moths & Mikes site. UK Moths say it spends it adults life in winter & Mike's site states it has never been recorded in July in Hamps.

Any advances on the others guys?

John

1. A. arenella
2. More inclined to T. advenella
3. Plausible
4. Cnephasias can't be done from photos
5. Pass
 

Brian Stone

A Stone chatting
Hants Moths show it as very occcasional in July and it's late July and you aren't in Hants. I don't think it's out of the question but another opinion would be welcomed.
 

Reader

Well-known member
Hi Brian

I had forgot that grey means less than 10%. I thought it meant no show.

I am still a complete novice compared to you guys and can only go by process of elimination using the various web sites. I will more than likely get it wrong on quite a few occasions but at least you can see why I arrived at certain ID's.

Any advances on the last five images?

John

Hants Moths show it as very occcasional in July and it's late July and you aren't in Hants. I don't think it's out of the question but another opinion would be welcomed.
 

MikeWall

HantsMoth-er
Thanks Brian

I have never seen a Clay like that before. I have looked at all the sites, UK Moths, Hants Moths etc and none of them show the almost kidney shape that is on this moth. Have you ever caught one like that Brian?

The 'kidney shape' is just wear. It shows the white discal spot of the Clay, so that's fine.

Mike
 

Reader

Well-known member
Thanks Mike & Brian

I will go with those.

I am still having problems with some and I am close to the point of giving up on about thirteen of them but here are five of those thirteen. See what you guys think.

1. ???
2. Is it a Light Brown Apple Moth or something else?
3. ???
4. ???
5. ???

John



Agree with Brian on the second set. The third is Oak Nycteoline. The last could be one of a number of things.

Mike
 

Attachments

  • DSCN5320.jpg
    DSCN5320.jpg
    90.2 KB · Views: 57
  • DSCN5346.jpg
    DSCN5346.jpg
    124.6 KB · Views: 62
  • DSCN5362.jpg
    DSCN5362.jpg
    99.3 KB · Views: 58
  • DSCN5348.jpg
    DSCN5348.jpg
    64.2 KB · Views: 68
  • DSCN5271.jpg
    DSCN5271.jpg
    69.4 KB · Views: 62

Brian Stone

A Stone chatting
First go.

#1 ?
#2 E. postvittana
#3 A. laterana/comariana (these are a dissection pair I think)
#4 ?
#5 Bud Moth

Last one is interesting as it keeps coming up and it's one I've struggled with in the past. It's very variable but there are some pointers beyond the initial size/shape.

Look at the position and angle of the demarcation between dark and light just basal side of half way. There is a dark trianglular mark towards the apex. Finally three black streaks are more or less distinct centrally towards the wing tip. These three points are marked on the attached pic and there's another for comparison.
 

Attachments

  • bud_moth_annotated.jpg
    bud_moth_annotated.jpg
    38.9 KB · Views: 58
  • bud_moth_17jul06_420_20.jpg
    bud_moth_17jul06_420_20.jpg
    20.2 KB · Views: 61
Last edited:

Reader

Well-known member
Hi Brian

I have caught a few Bud Moths in the past but none as dark as this one. Something hopefully learnt again. That No. 1 is confusing me also. Obviously a Noctuidae but I can't find that looks anything like it.

Well you have whittled away three more. How about these.

1. ???
2. ???
3. Poss Batia unitella
4. ???
5. ???

John



First go.

#1 ?
#2 E. postvittana
#3 A. laterana/comariana (these are a dissection pair I think)
#4 ?
#5 Bud Moth

Last one is interesting as it keeps coming up and it's one I've struggled with in the past. It's very variable but there are some pointers beyond the initial size/shape.

Look at the position and angle of the demarcation between dark and light just basal side of half way. There is a dark trianglular mark towards the apex. Finally three black streaks are more or less distinct centrally towards the wing tip. These three points are marked on the attached pic and there's another for comparison.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN5384.jpg
    DSCN5384.jpg
    106.4 KB · Views: 56
  • DSCN5341.jpg
    DSCN5341.jpg
    78.8 KB · Views: 58
  • DSCN5253.jpg
    DSCN5253.jpg
    67.1 KB · Views: 52
  • DSCN5365.jpg
    DSCN5365.jpg
    83.9 KB · Views: 54
  • DSCN5296.jpg
    DSCN5296.jpg
    58.6 KB · Views: 61

Users who are viewing this thread

Top