What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
My thoughts on the Zeiss 10X42SF
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="henry link" data-source="post: 3316138" data-attributes="member: 6806"><p>Peter,</p><p></p><p>i'm not Kimmo, but you might find your answer in this thread in which the distortions of the SF and SV are discussed:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=313034" target="_blank">http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=313034</a></p><p></p><p>I think the short answer is that angular magnification distortion, rather than rectilinear distortion, is the source of "rolling ball" for those who notice it. AMD causes objects to change shape as they near the field edge in a way that mimics the foreshortening of flat shapes painted on a ball as they move around the edge when the ball is rolling. In optical devices AMD begins when pincushion distortion is too weak to correct it, becomes quite strong at zero rectilinear distortion (perfectly straight lines) and stronger still with increasing barrel distortion. Try moving a small circle or square toward the field edge of your SF and notice how its shape changes. You may not personally experience an RB effect from that shape change, but that's the condition of distortion that causes other people to experience it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="henry link, post: 3316138, member: 6806"] Peter, i'm not Kimmo, but you might find your answer in this thread in which the distortions of the SF and SV are discussed: [url]http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=313034[/url] I think the short answer is that angular magnification distortion, rather than rectilinear distortion, is the source of "rolling ball" for those who notice it. AMD causes objects to change shape as they near the field edge in a way that mimics the foreshortening of flat shapes painted on a ball as they move around the edge when the ball is rolling. In optical devices AMD begins when pincushion distortion is too weak to correct it, becomes quite strong at zero rectilinear distortion (perfectly straight lines) and stronger still with increasing barrel distortion. Try moving a small circle or square toward the field edge of your SF and notice how its shape changes. You may not personally experience an RB effect from that shape change, but that's the condition of distortion that causes other people to experience it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
My thoughts on the Zeiss 10X42SF
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top