What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Bird Name Etymology
Names lacking in the Key
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James Jobling" data-source="post: 3580965" data-attributes="member: 106805"><p>Björn and Martin, thanks for your contributions re <strong><em>betsilei </em></strong>and <strong><em>nattereri</em></strong>. </p><p>From the plate I agree that <strong><em>Ornismya nattereri</em></strong> is a synonym of <strong><em>Augastes scutatus</em></strong>, and have added it to the <strong>Key</strong>.</p><p>I am in a quandary regarding extinct birds. A good starting point is Hume & Walters 2012, <em>Extinct Birds</em>, which treated taxa which have become extinct within the last 700 years. More recent is the comprehensive list of Tyrberg, Lagerqvist & Jirle, 2017, <em>Utdöda arter under Holocen fram til 1500</em>, which deals with the Holocene (c. 11,000 BC) to 1500. I am inclined only to treat those birds which may be considered to have been extant in the modern period (e.g. reliable contemporary accounts, descriptions and illustrations, remains found in middens). However, even though most of them are not in <em>HBW & BLI Illustrated Checklist</em>, for the sake of completeness I will enter all the names found in Hume & Walters 2012 and in Tyrberg <em>et al</em>. 2017, in the <strong>Key </strong><u>in due course</u> (when I have sorted out the living birds!)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James Jobling, post: 3580965, member: 106805"] Björn and Martin, thanks for your contributions re [B][I]betsilei [/I][/B]and [B][I]nattereri[/I][/B]. From the plate I agree that [B][I]Ornismya nattereri[/I][/B] is a synonym of [B][I]Augastes scutatus[/I][/B], and have added it to the [B]Key[/B]. I am in a quandary regarding extinct birds. A good starting point is Hume & Walters 2012, [I]Extinct Birds[/I], which treated taxa which have become extinct within the last 700 years. More recent is the comprehensive list of Tyrberg, Lagerqvist & Jirle, 2017, [I]Utdöda arter under Holocen fram til 1500[/I], which deals with the Holocene (c. 11,000 BC) to 1500. I am inclined only to treat those birds which may be considered to have been extant in the modern period (e.g. reliable contemporary accounts, descriptions and illustrations, remains found in middens). However, even though most of them are not in [I]HBW & BLI Illustrated Checklist[/I], for the sake of completeness I will enter all the names found in Hume & Walters 2012 and in Tyrberg [I]et al[/I]. 2017, in the [B]Key [/B][U]in due course[/U] (when I have sorted out the living birds!) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Bird Name Etymology
Names lacking in the Key
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top