What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Bird Name Etymology
Names lacking in the Key
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="l_raty" data-source="post: 3627969" data-attributes="member: 24811"><p>Bonaparte's French was sometimes a bit convoluted, and he often passed very quickly over various subjects, which made him hard to follow. It wasn't '<em>drovoni</em>' (as per Mark) which he said in the Delattre reprint to be from Guayaquil; it was another species that he there tentatively identified as "<em>Call. peruvianus</em>, Lesson". And it was neither '<em>drovoni</em>' (as per Björn), nor this other species (as per <a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/36194716" target="_blank">Zimmer</a>), that he later described as <em>masesus</em>; this was still another bird.</p><p></p><p>[<a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/53588632" target="_blank">Bonaparte 1854</a>]:</p><p></p><p>= Let's add [...] to the peculiar genus <em>Callirhynchus</em>, besides <em>Call. drovoni</em>, Verreaux, <u><strong>a third species</strong></u>, smaller, pale-billed, coming from Guayaquil : [Latin starts] <em>Very small, slightly greenish grey, with the rump of the same colour : with a white wing band : with a pale bill</em>. [Latin ends] Would this not be <em>Call. peruvianus</em>, Lesson?</p><p></p><p>(<em>Callyrhynchus peruvianus</em> Lesson 1842 is the type of <em>Callyrhynchus</em> Lesson 1842 by original monotypy: [<a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14714738" target="_blank">OD</a>].)</p><p></p><p>[<a href="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/1212636" target="_blank">Bonaparte 1856</a>]:</p><p></p><p>= The same thing happens again in the American genus <em>Callirhynchus</em>, Less. The species that we have described, after the specimen of the Muséum, is not the type species which the author presented, I think, to a museum of Belgium; I acquired a new proof of this by studying Lesson's manuscripts, which include, along with the original drawing of his type, many other figures and pieces of information valuable to science. Let's hope that the Muséum, to which the family of the deceased generously offers a selfless preference, will not let the chance to acquire such a treasure pass. Messrs. Verreaux described a third species, under the name of <em>Callirhynchus drovoni</em>, and I add here the characteristic phrase <strong><u>of a fourth one</u></strong>, which was just deposited in our great national institution along with other, no less precious, Fringillids.</p><p>[Latin starts] » CALLIRHYNCHUS MASESUS, <em>Bp.</em> <em>Fairly large ; greenish grey ; whitish below ; with the throat and the breast black, with two white jugular patches : with a white wing speculum : with the tail wholly grey : with the bill, particularly below, whitish.</em> » [Latin ends]</p><p></p><p>Note that '<em>drovoni</em>' could never be available as the name of a new species from either of these two publications, as the bird is nowhere described.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="l_raty, post: 3627969, member: 24811"] Bonaparte's French was sometimes a bit convoluted, and he often passed very quickly over various subjects, which made him hard to follow. It wasn't '[I]drovoni[/I]' (as per Mark) which he said in the Delattre reprint to be from Guayaquil; it was another species that he there tentatively identified as "[I]Call. peruvianus[/I], Lesson". And it was neither '[I]drovoni[/I]' (as per Björn), nor this other species (as per [URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/36194716"]Zimmer[/URL]), that he later described as [I]masesus[/I]; this was still another bird. [[URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/53588632"]Bonaparte 1854[/URL]]: = Let's add [...] to the peculiar genus [I]Callirhynchus[/I], besides [I]Call. drovoni[/I], Verreaux, [U][B]a third species[/B][/U], smaller, pale-billed, coming from Guayaquil : [Latin starts] [I]Very small, slightly greenish grey, with the rump of the same colour : with a white wing band : with a pale bill[/I]. [Latin ends] Would this not be [I]Call. peruvianus[/I], Lesson? ([I]Callyrhynchus peruvianus[/I] Lesson 1842 is the type of [I]Callyrhynchus[/I] Lesson 1842 by original monotypy: [[URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/14714738"]OD[/URL]].) [[URL="http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/1212636"]Bonaparte 1856[/URL]]: = The same thing happens again in the American genus [I]Callirhynchus[/I], Less. The species that we have described, after the specimen of the Muséum, is not the type species which the author presented, I think, to a museum of Belgium; I acquired a new proof of this by studying Lesson's manuscripts, which include, along with the original drawing of his type, many other figures and pieces of information valuable to science. Let's hope that the Muséum, to which the family of the deceased generously offers a selfless preference, will not let the chance to acquire such a treasure pass. Messrs. Verreaux described a third species, under the name of [I]Callirhynchus drovoni[/I], and I add here the characteristic phrase [B][U]of a fourth one[/U][/B], which was just deposited in our great national institution along with other, no less precious, Fringillids. [Latin starts] » CALLIRHYNCHUS MASESUS, [I]Bp.[/I] [I]Fairly large ; greenish grey ; whitish below ; with the throat and the breast black, with two white jugular patches : with a white wing speculum : with the tail wholly grey : with the bill, particularly below, whitish.[/I] » [Latin ends] Note that '[I]drovoni[/I]' could never be available as the name of a new species from either of these two publications, as the bird is nowhere described. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Bird Name Etymology
Names lacking in the Key
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top