What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Natural Sequence Farming
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chosun Juan" data-source="post: 3752639" data-attributes="member: 92780"><p>I don't think we necessarily need a population reduction per se, or other drastic controlling measures as Jape suggested. </p><p></p><p>We do though need a new paradigm for living - a lot of it 180° from where we've been and are headed at an accelerated rate.</p><p></p><p>We need:</p><p>1. To stop any further damage whatsoever, repair the land (wetlands and hydrological functioning a`la Peter Andrews), and reestablish at least a minimum of natural connectivity and old growth viability.</p><p>2. Further, we need to restore the arterial and lung functioning of the land - the unhindered creek /wetland / floodplain /river systems. We need to be building soil - not flushing it one- way down 'drains' into the oceans.</p><p>3. Further to that we need to establish humanity on a minimum footprint - islands of humanity in a vast sea of wilderness instead of the other way around as now.</p><p>4. These islands of humanity need to be logically arranged along a minimum number of transport corridors (that don't interrupt wilderness but rather fly over, tunnel under, or go around wilderness). Return to wilderness any presently humanised parts of the landscape not required to meet this condition. Minimum footprint mile high plus sky cities - correctly orientated and placed to maximize solar, wind (and wave and geothermal, where applicable) renewable resources.</p><p>5. Moreover, we need closed recyclable life cycles for our designed, produced, and consumed products and services. Waste is food.</p><p>6. We need a new paradigm where the 'True Cost' of any damage proposed to be done to the environment is quantified prior and fully accounted for. Mine /extraction sites that are returned to full natural functioning (aquifers and old growth vegetation etc). </p><p></p><p>Pretty easy really.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Chosun :gh:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chosun Juan, post: 3752639, member: 92780"] I don't think we necessarily need a population reduction per se, or other drastic controlling measures as Jape suggested. We do though need a new paradigm for living - a lot of it 180° from where we've been and are headed at an accelerated rate. We need: 1. To stop any further damage whatsoever, repair the land (wetlands and hydrological functioning a`la Peter Andrews), and reestablish at least a minimum of natural connectivity and old growth viability. 2. Further, we need to restore the arterial and lung functioning of the land - the unhindered creek /wetland / floodplain /river systems. We need to be building soil - not flushing it one- way down 'drains' into the oceans. 3. Further to that we need to establish humanity on a minimum footprint - islands of humanity in a vast sea of wilderness instead of the other way around as now. 4. These islands of humanity need to be logically arranged along a minimum number of transport corridors (that don't interrupt wilderness but rather fly over, tunnel under, or go around wilderness). Return to wilderness any presently humanised parts of the landscape not required to meet this condition. Minimum footprint mile high plus sky cities - correctly orientated and placed to maximize solar, wind (and wave and geothermal, where applicable) renewable resources. 5. Moreover, we need closed recyclable life cycles for our designed, produced, and consumed products and services. Waste is food. 6. We need a new paradigm where the 'True Cost' of any damage proposed to be done to the environment is quantified prior and fully accounted for. Mine /extraction sites that are returned to full natural functioning (aquifers and old growth vegetation etc). Pretty easy really. Chosun :gh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Conservation
Natural Sequence Farming
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top